« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Blueberry FRAUD

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 04 Aug 11 7:17 AM | 81 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 14229 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 14220 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Monkey, Why is it not fraud to call a lump of crapolla blueberries?




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Blueberry FRAUD
By: monkeytrots
in CONSTITUTION
Wed, 03 Aug 11 4:43 PM
Msg. 14220 of 21975

While the adverts in pics on the packages, and the wording in LARGE TYPE - imply high contents of REAL blueberries - the tiny, microscopic type of the required ingredients list (getting more unreadable to this old fart every passing day) do correctly 'identify' the contents.

I would NOT call that article from 'naturalnews' a piece of 'investigative' reporting - although it may be 'newsworthy' - investigation IMPLIES 'uncovering that which is not known'.

Fraud - by any legal definition, no.

Damned deceptive ?

Absolutely.

Gotta read the fine print .... nice in principle, difficult in practice - and tougher the older one gets.

NO - ABSOLUTELY NO - to the FDA being 'put to work'.

Turn out their FREAKING LIGHTS ALREADY - along with all these other so-called 'guvmint protectors'. THEY HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE. The 'pretext' of 'regulating trade between the states' - pretty damn thin excuse for what has become the bloated, all-consumer-ing monster of today.

I think this is ONE clause in the Constitution that the founding fathers would have run from, SCREAMING in abject horror, if they had even an INKLING of what could have been done with that silly allocation of power to the 'centralization monstrosity amigos'.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next