« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

BEST QUESTION OF THE DAY - Re: An Inquiry about a Constitutional Balanced Budget Amendment! 

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 26 Jul 11 11:59 AM | 47 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 14086 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 14078 by ribit)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Ribit - absolutley spot on question - and I believe it to be purely rhetorical (iotw: self-answering).

As I stated before, the courts, congress, and the potus ALL have routinely ignored the clear written meanings in the Constitution - and will continue to do so.

As I recently stated, this 'Balanced Budget Ammendment' idead is a really, really, really BAD idea - for the above reason - it makes no difference to the jackasses and assholes currently occupying our government (read 95% of all occupiers - both repub and dem ).

In light of that - your gut tells you two things:

#1.) Any 'new' ammendment(s) to the Constitution would suffer from the same 'ignoring' as the rest of the Constitution.

#2.) The potential for any NEW ammendments to bite us in the ass are HUGE.

Methinks that what you have outlined as a 'possiblity', Sire Ribit, goes far beyond being a 'probability' and ranks right up there with being:

1.) a foregone conclusion.
2.) an absolute certainty.

and lastly, but not leastly (sic) ....

3.) A "You better bet your sweet ass that will happen, baby."




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
An Inquiry about a Constitutional Balanced Budget Amendment!
By: ribit
in CONSTITUTION
Tue, 26 Jul 11 3:24 AM
Msg. 14078 of 21975

An Inquiry about a Constitutional Balanced Budget Amendment!

In the past, the courts have taken "activist" roles when it comes to Interpreting and or implementing what they say the Constitution says. For example, from the sixties there were problems with some schools in the South and later on in the North when they were perceived as "dragging their feet" when it came to integrating the schools. My inquiry is regarding the balanced budget amendment and whether or not we could find ourselves in a situation where a panel of liberal judges appointed for life were making budget decisions about which programs could be cut and which ones not cut?

Im not saying this would happen, but could it happen? Would you be happy with the folks on the court from the left deciding how much our military should get or how much in taxes someone should pay? I can see all sorts of unpleasant scenarios here. Writing this amendment would have to be done very carefully and spell out in explicit detail exactly who handles the purse strings.

Just a bit concerned here. I still support the notion of a balanced budget amendment.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next