http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4s_IUwwGq-A
As usual - give me cogitatin' time. There is still a lot of truth in what I state about the electability of Ron Paul - but I continue to listen.
Not sure if THIS is the video that pissed me off so greatly the first time through - I don't think it was - but it very well may have been.
It didn't piss me off this time - The attack in this speech is SPECIFICALLY directed at 'special interests' that control U.S. Foreign Policy - and that is the correct target.
There IS a mistake though - I glaring one - where 'war and military spending is ALWAYS destructive to the economy' @1:22 - not true. Military spending can and DOES protect the economy - not 'always destructive to it'. Pearl Harbor, Mr. Paul ? War and Military Spending are, at times, necessary - or no economy would exist. Sorry - poorly thought out Mr. Paul - good sounding words for Pacificists. Yeah - I know - the Ron Paul meme that ALL wars are the result of OUR 'special interest groups' doing evil things.
This one is another 'election killer'. He may be absolutely correct - but that really doesn't matter.
Mr. Paul - for what reason does the Federal Government exist AT ALL ?
I would argue, based on the Constitution, that 99% of the 'reason' is based totally on a Military that will protect this Nation from Foreign Aggressors - and that the 'other' reasons/Constitutional authorities of the 'Government' pale in comparison to that.
Get rid of EVERYTHING 'Federal' EXCEPT for the Military.
That is something that I could not only 'live with' - but could full heartedly support.
Mr. Paul could not/would not - if his words are taken literally that '.... military spending is ALWAYS destructive to the economy.'
Out of context ? No, not at all.

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...