« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Euphemysticism... 

By: DueDillinger in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 14 Jul 11 8:01 PM | 41 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 13843 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 13841 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...As for “dag nab,” it’s a variation of “dad-gum,” a member of another branch of the same family. The slang dictionary says that “dad,” when used as an interjection in combination forms, is “a euphemistic alteration of God … used in various mild oaths.” The first such usage, “by Dad,” was recorded in 1678.

Variations on this theme include (and I won’t attempt to give all the spellings) “dad-bing,” “dad-blame,” “dad-blast,” “dad-bloom,” “dad-burn,” “dad-gum,” daggone,” and “dagnab.”

As a child growing up in Iowa, I often heard irritated grownups say “gol-dang-it” or “what the ding-dong!”

http://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2008/12/euphemysticism.html

Uploaded Image

∆∆




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: The Admin Announcements
By: monkeytrots
in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 14 Jul 11 7:10 PM
Msg. 13841 of 21975

That would be "DADGUMyankee" - which is the strongest of the three.

Yes, dadburn is a stronger epithet than dagnab - more commonly heard as "dagnabbit". (there are TWO b's in that there word)

*w*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFnYmTCj8Jk


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next