Using the logic that 'cancelling a peace treaty' is equivalent to a declaration of war - would it be that far a step to say that 'logical consistency' would maintain that the LACK of a peace treaty is equivalent to a 'state of war' existing.
Obviously - that second - loosely connected - statement is false. Just because a peace treaty does not exist between two countries does not mean that they are 'at war' with each other - nor does it mean that they have 'declared war' on each other.
The reality is that the case with Egypt is NOT logical - that once that 'peace treaty' is 'cancelled' - a MFB (muslim 'f'ing brotherhood) government WOULD be waging war on Israel. Not a doubt in any reasonable and reasonably educated person's mind about that fact.
Boils down to this - Is the UNITED STATES maintaining a 'reasonable' position to 'pre-emptively' strike nation-states that 'promote terrorism'.
IF WE, the United States, are morally justified in doing such - then, by damn, the country of Israel is also.
Monkey see - monkey do.
Just thoughts in passing - and a little bit 'deeper' inspection of the 'emotional phrasing of the issue' - which is usually MONKEY'S gig .... and not Due's. *w*
~monkey .... trots ...
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...
| 