Doesn't really matter or not, does it, Due (rhetorical) ?
That is called mis-direction - imo.
The real issue, that you properly pointed out, is that the airstrike by NATO actually did occur, and that the damage to the facility is irrefutable.
WTF business does NATO have bombing ANY country ?
Much less using American resources, in TOTAL violation of the United States Constitution, to do so.
(The use of U.S. resources, either directly or indirectly, would be pretty hard to refute also.)
TIME TO IMPEACH, TRY, AND RENDER JUDGEMENT on this piece of crap illegally occupying the United States White House.