« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Did NATO really kill Qaddafi's son and grandkids in a missile strike?

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 02 May 11 3:16 AM | 39 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 12994 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 12993 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Monkey, that might be debatable in court? I thought Congress approved the WOT, of which the Bush Doctrine was a part?

Ah, it's bad when the shorter term memory's a-goin', but I thought offensive moves in foreign countries was part of the WOT deal. . . .




Avatar




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Did NATO really kill Qaddafi's son and grandkids in a missile strike?
By: monkeytrots
in CONSTITUTION
Mon, 02 May 11 12:46 AM
Msg. 12993 of 21975

Doesn't really matter or not, does it, Due (rhetorical) ?

That is called mis-direction - imo.

The real issue, that you properly pointed out, is that the airstrike by NATO actually did occur, and that the damage to the facility is irrefutable.

WTF business does NATO have bombing ANY country ?

Much less using American resources, in TOTAL violation of the United States Constitution, to do so.

(The use of U.S. resources, either directly or indirectly, would be pretty hard to refute also.)

TIME TO IMPEACH, TRY, AND RENDER JUDGEMENT on this piece of crap illegally occupying the United States White House.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next