« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Time To Kill Ethanol Subsidies ... Bring back MTBE. em

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 21 Apr 11 8:34 AM | 49 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 12862 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 12860 by lkorrow)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Actually, the theory was that replacing MTBE in Gasoline with ethanol would not be as financially dangerous to the entire gasoline industry.

We do not have 'high levels' of ethanol in gasoline for the purpose of reducing oil imports.

The ENTIRE reason for the wide spread use of ethanol in gasoline was SOLELY to meet EPA REGULATIONS regarding oxygenate contents in gasoline - regulations that were NEVER legislated into law.

MTBE, made easily from natural gas, was the previous primary oxygenate, not a carcinogen, not toxic, but tastes very foul at even the parts per billion range when ground water is contaminated (sunlight exposure quickly breaks this compound down into harmless byproducts). Groundwater contamination can occurs anytime a vehicle accident breeches a gas tank, from the underground pipes at filling stations when they have corrosion problems, or from tankers involved in accidents.

The THREAT OF LITIGATION over these minute spills and extremely low levels of contamination were a ruinous hammer being held over the heads of the Gasoline Industry. MTBE was ONLY being added to gasoline due to FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MANDATE on oxygen content - and the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT absolutely refused to indemnify the industry against the potential litigation. Hyup - a real 'moral' government there.

So, the entire industry unanimously quit using MTBE - and switched to ethanol for oxygenate content.

YES, there was a very small amount of 'gasohol' on the market prior to this - under the theory of 'green energy' - but the overwhelming reason for ethanol in gasoline today has not a single thing to do with attempts to reduce 'oil imports' or the 'building of new refineries'.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Time To Kill Ethanol Subsidies ... Bring back MTBE. em
By: lkorrow
in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 21 Apr 11 3:59 AM
Msg. 12860 of 21975

Theory was ethanol would reduce oil imports, reduce the cost of fuel and negate the need to build more oil refineries. New refineries would be ethanol plants.

That worked well, didn't it. Next.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next