Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Rittenhouse trial

By: ribit in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 14 Nov 21 2:17 AM | 17 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 26605 of 60014
(This msg. is a reply to 26600 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...the rittenhouse lawyer with no hair is a prissy sumbitch.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Rittenhouse trial
By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE
Sat, 13 Nov 21 11:57 PM 		Msg. 26600 of 60014

ribit:

Re: “udge Tells Rittenhouse He's 'Raising' Conviction Risk as Jury Also Weighs Lesser Charges”Seems unfair to me. If Rittenhouse had known that he could be convicted of lesser charges, he might have spent more time arguing his innocence with regard to those charges. But I know it's a common practice in the courts, and if his lawyers are competent, they should be taking that possibility into account already. But they aren't competent. That, at least, is the opinion of the attorneys on the Rekieta Law Youtube channel where I've been watching the trial. They think the lawyers on BOTH sides are inept. They've said that if Rittenhouse gets convicted of anything, he should sue his own lawyers for Malpractice. They've been resting on their laurels, hardly objecting to any of the outrageous nonsense coming from the other side. Most think that a request for Mistrial With Prejudice, or at least a motion to dismiss based on the prosecution failing to make its case, should have filed by now.

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next