« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: This is a little more than disturbing 

By: micro in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 19 Feb 20 9:16 PM | 23 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 52484 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 52468 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

De
I never said I was voting for a democrat. I just won't vote for Trump. I think I can apply enough busines lessons and economics so that Iwill write myself in and vote for me for President. At least I am honest and not a scumbag or on cahoots with people I should not be nor ever have been.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: This is a little more than disturbing
By: Decomposed
in POPE 5
Wed, 19 Feb 20 7:57 PM
Msg. 52468 of 62138

Beldin:

Re: "Is this not the case to which we are referring? "
I think so. The next question, I guess, is What Does The Law Say About Diplomatic Immunity? Are Americans who commit crimes abroad immune to prosecution, or is it up to the State Department to decide on a case by case basis?

I will say this: Some years ago (1997), a diplomat from the Republic of Georgia killed a Maryland teenager while driving drunk. Although he had immunity, Georgia waived it so that the U.S. was able to prosecute. He was convicted and sentenced to 7 to 21 years. In 2000, he was repatriated to Georgia. In 2002, he was released.

It seems to me that the circumstances were very similar - except, of course, that driving on the wrong side of the road (in England) is obviously an accident while the Georgia diplomat was drunk.

Still, it looks like a precedent for waiving immunity exists and the U.S. has previously benefited from it. Fair is fair....

I don't think I would use this as an excuse to vote for a Democrat, though!!!! Their policies are many, many, MANY times worse than Trump's.


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next