« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Bloomberg says a 95 year old with cancer should be denied treatments 

By: micro in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (2)
Mon, 17 Feb 20 4:14 PM | 27 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 52256 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 52254 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

De

NATIONALIZED everything is the ultimate goal of people like Bloombutt and his ilk. That is how they gaon control over the entire populace.... And the result is they decide who gets treatment to live and who has to die...

I have lots of rop and plenty of wood and a woodworking shop. I could solve this problem readily if it were legal.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Bloomberg says a 95 year old with cancer should be denied treatments
By: Decomposed
in POPE 5
Mon, 17 Feb 20 3:52 PM
Msg. 52254 of 62138

micro:

Re: "This is part of population control the Bildeberger global elitists klike the Bush's, Gates family, Clintoon, Billy Gates, Soros and a host more of elitists from around the world aspire to do. "
This is the fundamental and fatal flaw in nationalized health insurance. Under privatized systems, it is not any of the public's business how much money is spent to keep insured citizens… even hopelessly sick citizens… alive. People work it out ahead of time with their insurance companies, or they pay for their care out of their own pockets. But once things are nationalized, government takes an interest. After all, there isn't enough money in government coffers, or in the world, to provide medical care for every person up until the second of his or her death.

Nationalized health insurance necessarily means that there is an upper limit to how much will be spent to keep people alive. I think that's disgusting. Even if you have the resources to pay for your continued care, you won't be allowed to. This is essentially how my mother died. The hospital made the decision to send her to hospice to die because of her condition and the fact that she'd hit the limits set under Medicare. She, and we, weren't even asked if we wanted to pay to continue her treatment.


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next