http://www.dailywire.com/news/feminists-freak-out-after-discovering-men-dont-want-to-date-woke-women
First, please allow me to get something off my chest before we begin ... BWHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ... gasp! ... HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ... gasp! ... HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
There ... thank you.
Emily Zanotti
The Daily Wire
January 23, 2020
It turns out, there is an entire segment of men - even, perhaps, a rather large one - that has sworn off dating "woke women," and feminists, predictably, are quite angry about it.
One writer at the women's lifestyle site, Refinery 29, gave voice to the collective feminist angst on Wednesday, when she penned an emotional, several-thousand-word essay, bemoaning the men who "deny racism and sexism," perpetuate the Patriarchy, decry white privilege, and, ultimately, declaring those who refuse to pair up with the women who could give them comprehensive lectures on the subject over vegan meals, "insidious."
It took her THOUSANDS of words to wimper, cry, and stamp her lil' feet? WOW! And hey ... guess what you guys ... we're "insidious"! How cool is that, eh?
The problem all started with British drama star, Laurence Fox, who declared, on the BBC, that he does not believe criticism of Duchess Meghan stems from racism, and then followed up his transgression against social justice by insisting in the pages of one of the United Kingdom's top newspapers that he does not date woke women.
This is Laurence Fox ...
Don't know if you like British mysteries on PBS, but I do. Laurence Fox played Detective Sergeant James Hathaway on the series Lewis, which was a continuation of the older Morse series. Hathaway was a great character who was played superbly by Fox, IMHO - but, I digress.
That is all just too much for feminists, it seems, who, despite swearing off men so often it's practically their pledge of allegiance, want desperately to have the pick of men to partner with - and to deny them such a variety is, apparently, oppressive, sexist, and, for good measure, very "Donald Trump."
Awww ... those poor deprived British feminists! I guess they desperately need President Trump to come across the pond and grab them by the pussy, eh? Good grief! Trump gets blamed for EVERYTHING ... even the fact that British feminists are getting ignored and sexually frustrated by men who give them the tingles.
"He thinks that it's 'institutionally racist' to tell the story of the First World War in a racially diverse way, irrespective of the fact that Sikh soldiers absolutely fought for Britain," the gobsmacked writer wails. "And he also doesn't believe in white privilege, irrespective of the fact that he works in a painfully undiverse industry, was privately educated and comes from a wealthy acting family which is nothing short of a dynasty."
The nerve.
But it gets worse. Fox's lack of woke bona fides is actually causing an entire generation of woke women mental harm.
Sorry, dearies ... your mental harm has been self-inflicted.
"Fox is denying racism and sexism," she writes, "irrespective of whether or not they exist. It's nothing short of gaslighting ... It's all very Donald Trump."
Of course it is.
ROTFLMAO! You desperately want men like Fox inside of you, but when you find out that ain't gonna happen ... because your inner raging bitchiness quite understandably repulses them ... YOU BLAME YOUR VERY OWN UNDESIRABLE NATURE ON DONALD TRUMP???!!! BWHA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
The author says she could go to great lengths to prove just how wrong Fox is - that "white privilege" exists, and that "institutionalized racism" is effectively eliminated by, say, including a single Sikh soldier in a movie about World War I, but she won't, because Fox is clearly mentally ill (he does, after all, like arguing with feminists on Twitter, so she may not be wrong). And she could joke about Fox's lack of wokeness, but in perhaps the most feminist line in the entire article, she insists that there's nothing about his behavior that's funny.
She simply says he should be deplatformed before his ideas creep into the psyches of other males, who then start refusing to date feminists, too. But unfortunately for her, it's already happening.
To illustrate her point, she writes, in what can only be "hushed tones," about the men she and her friends have matched with on dating apps who say "openly sexist and misogynistic things" in their Tinder bios (like "I hate big eyebrows" or "no psychos," two terms the author unintentionally reveals to be effective at weeding her out of the dating pool), and who hold "right-wing views" even if they consider themselves liberal.
OH MY ... the horror of it all! There are men out there who don't want to date psycho women!!!
There's even a rash of men, she writes in horror, who have read Jordan Peterson, who has suggested that "white privilege" is a lie and that pursuing "social justice" is a pointless and toxic endeavor.
"White privilege" - check ... yes, this is a lie. "Social justice" - check ... yes, it is pointless and a toxic endeavor.
These men, she says, then have a tendency to group together which, she posits, is how humanity got "incels" and online white supremacist chat rooms, though without any evidentiary support. Men who don't like feminists should not be allowed to associate with anyone else, she seems to suggest, lest they share wrong ideas.
And make no mistake, their ideas are wrong. "When you're used to privilege, equality feels like oppression," she says.
The good news is, these men who refuse to date woke women are responsible for everything from the murder of a Labour MP several years ago before Brexit, to the rise of Donald Trump, to the continued oppression of the entire female gender (to the extent that gender still exists), to "Megxit" - Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's decision to leave the UK to find a new life in Canada - to the rise of right-wing media.
But if this all sounds as though the author is demonizing these men who simply wouldn't consider her for a date, rest assured, she is. After all, despite devoting thousands of words to the subject of being these men's sworn enemy, she is not, in fact, an enemy at all, except in their imaginations.
True. This harpy and her fellow feminists are NOT the enemies of discriminating gentlemen like Laurence Fox ... no, they're simply overlooked and ignored by these men due to their very own odious nature ... which is far, far worse. ROTFLMAO!
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
