« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Articles of Impeachment and the Freedom of Information Act 

By: ribit in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (2)
Fri, 20 Dec 19 1:21 AM | 21 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 47291 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 47289 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...Nancy wants to use Alcee Hastings but thinks he should be allowed to take off his "ankle monitor" for such a momentous case.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Articles of Impeachment and the Freedom of Information Act
By: Beldin
in POPE 5
Fri, 20 Dec 19 1:16 AM
Msg. 47289 of 62138

Mark Levin Explains Why Pelosi Withholding Impeachment Articles Is Unconstitutional And Disastrous For Dems

http://www.dailywire.com/news/mark-levin-explains-why-pelosi-withholding-impeachment-articles-would-be-unconstitutional-and-disastrous-for-dems

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is considering withholding the Democrats' articles of impeachment - passed without a single Republican vote - from the U.S. Senate in an attempt to pressure the Republican-controlled Senate to cave to Democratic demands on how to conduct a "fair" impeachment trial. But constitutional lawyer and conservative commentator Mark Levin says such an act would be "brazen[ly]" unconstitutional and would provide Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell with a golden opportunity. ...

"Though the House adopted two articles of impeachment charging Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of congressional investigations, it must pass a second resolution formally naming impeachment managers to present the case in the Senate," Politico explains. "That second vehicle triggers the official transmission of articles to the Senate."

In a series of posts on social media early Thursday, Levin called out Pelosi for considering the "brazen unconstitutional act" and laid out a plan for McConnell and his fellow Senate Republicans for how to respond if Democrats should got that route.

"Nancy Pelosi was apparently advised by leftwing Harvard law professor Lawrence Tribe to delay sending the impeachment to the Senate. So she's unilaterally sitting on the impeachment. This is another brazen unconstitutional act," Levin wrote, in a thread that's starting to gain some attention online.

"Here's what Mitch McConnell and the Senate Republicans must do in response: The Senate has the sole power under the Constitution to adjudicate an impeachment. Therefore, Pelosi is attempting to obstruct the Senate's power to act on its constitutional authority," the Fox News host continued.

"McConnell should immediately put an end to this and declare the impeachment null and void as the speaker has failed to complete the impeachment process by timely sending it to the Senate for adjudication," Levin added.

"McConnell has no less authority to unilaterally make such a decision than Pelosi does to withhold the administrative notification of an impeachment to the Senate either indefinitely or [with] conditions," he concluded. "Her effort to cripple the presidency [and] blackmail the Senate must be defeated." ...


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next