« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Lisa Page explains what she meant by "insurance policy" in interview with Rachel Maddow 

By: ribit in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 19 Dec 19 2:04 AM | 23 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 47195 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 47190 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...ya know I would have asked her how her husband and kids felt about her sport fornicating with the guy with the ugly eyes.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Lisa Page explains what she meant by "insurance policy" in interview with Rachel Maddow
By: Beldin
in POPE 5
Thu, 19 Dec 19 1:36 AM
Msg. 47190 of 62138

http://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2019/12/18/lisa-page-explains-what-she-meant-by-insurance-policy-in-interview-with-rachel-maddow/

Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page sat down with Rachel Maddow last night and finally explained what she meant by that "insurance policy" text she sent to her former lover, Peter Strzok:

The Daily Caller ~"Lisa Page @NatSecLisa is asked by @maddow to clarify her "insurance policy" and other anti-Trump text messages with Peter Strzok during the 2016 election."

Transcript and write-up via our sister site PJ Media:

"We're using an analogy. We're talking about whether or not we should take certain investigative steps or not based on the likelihood that he's going to be president or not, right? You have to keep in mind if President Trump doesn't become president the national security risk if there is somebody in his campaign associated with Russia plummets," Page said on Tuesday night during an MSNBC interview.

"You're not so worried about what Russia is doing vis-a-vis a member of his campaign if he's not president because you're not going to have access to classified information, you're not going to have access to sources and methods in our national security apparatus," she added.

In other words, she confessed?

Yes ... in other words, she confessed to being a Deep State operative trying to manufacture enough innuendo to overthrow a duly elected POTUS if the American people end up not electing her preferred candidate. This is also known as treason. 

Jordan Schachtel ~"We're talking about ... whether or not we should take certain investigative steps or not based on the likelihood he's going to be president or not."

Thank you for your confession, @NatSecLisa!" ...


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next