« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

ZIMBLERZERO---- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Treated Again For Cancer

By: kathy_s16 in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 24 Aug 19 2:20 PM | 22 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 38461 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 38421 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

In November 2013, the then-Democratic Senate majority eliminated the filibuster for executive branch nominees and judicial nominees except for Supreme Court nominees by invoking the so-called nuclear option. In April 2017, the Republican Senate majority applied the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominations as well,[2] enabling the nominations of Trump nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to proceed to a vote.[3][4

---------------

GOOD 'OLE HARRY REID - CAME BACK TO BITE HIM IN THE REAR. AWWWWWW....

---------

ARTICLE FROM THIS MORNING ABOUT KAVANAUGH:

HuffPost Sued for Defamation in Kavanaugh Article

Defendants knew the quoted statement . . . was false when it was published'

Justice Brett Kavanaugh / Getty Images

Alex Griswold - August 23, 2019 12:10 PM

A Mississippi man is suing HuffPost and its former reporter Ashley Feinberg for claiming that he was responsible for the death of Robert F. Kennedy's son David in a story on then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

At the height of the controversy over a series of sexual assault allegations made against Kavanaugh, the liberal outlet published a piece headlined "Former Student: Brett Kavanaugh's Prep School Party Scene Was A ‘Free-For-All.'"

The anonymous former student who served as Feinberg's source cited the 1984 overdose death of David Kennedy as the catalyst for change at Georgetown Prep. Feinberg, now at Slate, wrote that "two students — David's brother Doug, and his friend Derrick Evans — had helped score the coke."

Evans, an African-American professor and community activist who attended Georgetown Prep on a full scholarship, filed a defamation lawsuit Wednesday claiming HuffPost made no effort to contact him before accusing him of a crime that led to a man's death. The complaint chalks the inaccuracies in the piece up to a "zeal to create a sensational article about Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s years at [Georgetown Prep] and thereby drive traffic to its website."

"Indeed, if Ms. Feinberg or her HuffPost editors had done even the most basic research of publicly available sources, she and they would have known, if they did not already know, that Mr. Evans actively assisted law enforcement in identifying and prosecuting the individuals who actually sold the illegal narcotics," the lawsuit reads.

Doug Kennedy's employer Fox News did contact HuffPost to complain, which led to the following correction: "This article previously stated incorrectly that Doug Kennedy was involved in helping his brother to purchase drugs in 1984. Kennedy was only sharing a room with Derrick Evans, who helped David purchase the drugs, according to an affidavit obtained by the New York Times. We regret the error."

But Evans alleges in the lawsuit that the correction was also defamatory. The New York Times reported two other men were arrested for selling Kennedy the drugs, Evans was merely "present," and his testimony led to their arrests.

"The September 21 correction was another complete fabrication published by HuffPost with actual knowledge that both it and the original publication were false or in reckless disregard of the truth, again without ever attempting to contact Mr. Evans for comment," the lawsuit reads. "As HuffPost knew, there was NO affidavit reflecting that Mr. Evans ever helped anyone purchase illegal drugs. Defendants had no such affidavit in their possession, and they could not have had such an affidavit in their possession."

The HuffPost article in question has since been scrubbed of any reference to the Kennedy brothers or Evans. "This article previously mischaracterized the involvement of individuals in a drug purchase. References to those individuals and the incident have been removed," a correction reads. "We regret the error. Additionally, certain references by the former student to specific individuals have been removed to better reflect the intended purpose of the article: to provide a former student’s general characterizations of the party culture."

http://freebeacon.com/politics/huffpost-sued-for-defamation-in-kavanaugh-article/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&;utm_campaign=468629dad9-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_08_23_08_05_COPY_230&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-468629dad9-46526853


If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: DECOMPOSED ----- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Treated Again For Cancer
By: Zimbler0
in POPE 5
Sat, 24 Aug 19 2:18 AM
Msg. 38421 of 62138

Kathy > THIS MIGHT NOT BE THE APPROPRIATE TIME TO BRING THIS UP, BUT IF SHE PASSES SOON AND TRUMP NOMINATES MERRITT GARLAND, THE LIBTARDOS WILL VOTE HIM DOWN.


Sombeody correct me if I'm wrong . . .
But don't the Repugnicans still hold a small majority in the Senate?
And the Senate is where the confirmation takes place. The libtardos
have no 'honest' way to keep Trump's pick from the Court.

Zim.

>>>
Appointment and confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appointment_and_confirmation_to_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

The appointment and confirmation of Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps set forth by the United States Constitution, which have been further refined and developed by decades of tradition. Candidates are nominated by the President of the United States and must face a series of hearings in which both the nominee and other witnesses make statements and answer questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which can vote to send the nomination to the full United States Senate.[1] Confirmation by the Senate allows the President to formally appoint the candidate to the court.[1] The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.

Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975. In November 2013, the then-Democratic Senate majority eliminated the filibuster for executive branch nominees and judicial nominees except for Supreme Court nominees by invoking the so-called nuclear option. In April 2017, the Republican Senate majority applied the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominations as well,[2] enabling the nominations of Trump nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to proceed to a vote.[3][4
>>>


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next