Kathy > THIS MIGHT NOT BE THE APPROPRIATE TIME TO BRING THIS UP, BUT IF SHE PASSES SOON AND TRUMP NOMINATES MERRITT GARLAND, THE LIBTARDOS WILL VOTE HIM DOWN.
Sombeody correct me if I'm wrong . . .
But don't the Repugnicans still hold a small majority in the Senate?
And the Senate is where the confirmation takes place. The libtardos
have no 'honest' way to keep Trump's pick from the Court.
Zim.
>>>
Appointment and confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appointment_and_confirmation_to_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
The appointment and confirmation of Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps set forth by the United States Constitution, which have been further refined and developed by decades of tradition. Candidates are nominated by the President of the United States and must face a series of hearings in which both the nominee and other witnesses make statements and answer questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which can vote to send the nomination to the full United States Senate.[1] Confirmation by the Senate allows the President to formally appoint the candidate to the court.[1] The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.
Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975. In November 2013, the then-Democratic Senate majority eliminated the filibuster for executive branch nominees and judicial nominees except for Supreme Court nominees by invoking the so-called nuclear option. In April 2017, the Republican Senate majority applied the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominations as well,[2] enabling the nominations of Trump nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to proceed to a vote.[3][4
>>>
Mad Poet Strikes Again.
| 
