Replies to Msg. #1089444
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
34038 Re: Free energy - Zimbler/ Hydro_Gen
   In your comments to Zim you made this statement: [b][color=green]I a...
micro   POPE 5   15 Jun 2019
3:00 PM
34022 Re: Free energy - Zimbler
   Hydro_Gen > WHY have we not accomplished the same with energy?? WHY???...
Zimbler0   POPE 5   15 Jun 2019
3:03 AM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: Free energy - Zimbler

By: hydro_gen in POPE 5
Fri, 14 Jun 19 11:52 PM
Msg. 34020 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 34016 by Zimbler0)
Jump to msg. #  

Zimbler you said Hydro_Gen - here should be a link to the patent office. Looks like there is a tutorial to help you navigate the murky waters. LMAO!!!! Zimbler you are a little over the tips of your skis sir and obviously either are ignoring the salient points or failed to comprehend my earlier post, message #33993 regarding the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 especially the part that I bolded that said: At the end of fiscal year 2018, there were 5,792 secrecy orders in effect!! SO you do not think that there might be something hiding within the 5,792 patents they have told us are secret - not to mention the numerous other inventions that patents were NOT filed for?? If you answered in the affirmative then I have bridges for sale, and cheap. Also, I KNOW how to search the USPTO databases, as well as other US databases such as PACER, and have done so for decades as it has been personally very beneficial exploring potential investment opportunities. I have NEVER EVER stated that You seem to want the government to search the patents . . . the same government you
accuse of hiding the patents in the first place.
I have stated that we need a Manhattan Style effort to scour the Global patent databases. This does NOT have to be government funded or controlled - we DO NEED FULL access to said databases. I am advocating for smaller government and you guys seem to love the damned IRS!!

Zimbler you also said The Model-T had a tiny engine
driving a light weight vehicle. My mid sized pickup trucks got better mileage and weighed a lot more. (And went a LOT faster.)
How can you call a 480 POUND MOTOR a tiny engine when the Model T curb weight was 1200 pounds?? The engine representing 40% total vehicular weight is not what most would consider being tiny. A current smallest base F150 pickup truck weighs in at 4,100 pounds. Its engine does NOT weigh 40% of the curb weight AND the fuel economy is still only 22mpg.

Since you seem to be so knowledgeable and so quick in attempting to add edification to my posts, can you address this question I posted in message #33993? We went from the Wright Brothers biplane flying 59 seconds and 852 feet in 1903 to the SR 71 in 1964, a mere 61 years later and a massive leap in technology. WHY have we not accomplished the same with energy?? WHY??????

I look forward to the next chuckle or your reply - which ever comes first.

PEACE