The link to Snopes in your article does not work
--------------
You are so right, medear. Sorry about that, but you'll have to blame Milton, my friend who sends me emails ALL THE FREAKING TIME.
My mistake for not double-checking it.
I was trying to clean out my inbox. READ THAT AGAIN.
))
I have never liked snopes. At one time, it was run by a married libtardo couple who answered questions at their kitchen table. In checking it out further, it seems FAKEBOOK hired them to fact-check their info.
Give me a break.
-----------------
Snopes and Editorializing Fact Checks
We at RealClearPolitics’ Fact Check Review are making an earnest effort to better understand how fact checkers work -- and to share our findings with the public. We are doing so because much is unknown about the fact-checking process. What is clear, however, is that fact checkers are becoming increasingly influential -- even to the point of being able to censor what you read.
The core of our project is hosting a site where you can view and search the data we are collecting about fact checks and the organizations that publish them. But to provide context beyond the numbers, we have also been regularly writing about observations we make while assessing the fact checks.
EVEN THOUGH THERE IS MORE, I FOUND THIS INTERESTING:
Snopes deserves praise because of the six sites we are examining -- which are the same ones helping Facebook determine what you see on your feed -- we have found that it is the *** least likely to “fact-check” matters of opinion.*** It is impossible to verify a subjective matter, so “fact-checking” opinions is a fool’s errand. It is also a surefire way to introduce bias into the fact-checking process, as the natural counter to an opinion is often another opinion.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/07/18/snopes_and_editorializing_fact_checks_137551.html
--------
I read the entire article and I still think that snopes sucks.
Thanks for reminding me NOT to post emails.
Waa Waa, it wasn't my fault!
And I live in Cali!
| 
