Yep, and that is exactly as it should be.
http://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/20/los-angeles-times-border-agencies-return-pregnant-migrants-to-mexico/
Border officers are returning pregnant migrants to Mexico, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Under the headline, "Pregnant women, other vulnerable asylum seekers are returned to Mexico to await hearings," the Los Angeles Times described how President Donald Trump's "Remain in Mexico" policy is reducing the ability of adventurous migrants to give birth in the United States:
When Enma Hernandez crossed the Rio Grande here illegally about two weeks ago and approached Border Patrol agents seeking asylum, she told them she was eight months pregnant.
Hernandez, 26, said she had fled Guatemala hoping to join her husband and 2-year-old daughter in Miami. Instead, U.S. immigration officials returned her to Ciudad Juarez under the Trump administration's "Remain in Mexico" policy. ...
Hernandez says American officials should let pregnant women remain in the U.S. until their asylum cases are decided. "We should be an exception because we are vulnerable," she said. "It's dangerous for us here."
Four other pregnant migrants crossed the bridge on Thursday with her, along with a new mother carrying her 6-day-old daughter. All were in the Remain in Mexico program.
Sorry Enma, but you weren't too vulnerable to travel thousands of miles in your bid to sponge off of American citizens. You are simply hoping to take advantage of American taxpayers by squatting behind an American bush and birthing a so-called "anchor baby" - solely due to an obvious misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment of The U.S. Constitution. Even if you did give birth to your baby within the borders of the United States, your child would NOT be a U.S. citizen, lady. Your husband is here illegally and you would be here illegally. Therefore, your baby would NOT be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States - your baby will be a citizen of Guatamala no matter where it is born.
| 
