« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: College President Argues Against Free Speech on Campus

By: micro in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 08 Apr 19 11:40 PM | 59 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 29754 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 29746 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Tell him Beldin. Tell him how you really feel about it! Thumbs Up Thumbs Up Thumbs Up You told the truth. He is the one trying to control conversations. In the GUISE and petense of wanting to be a hro that keeps down dissent between oposing opinions.

Right dead on Sir Wizard. As usual..


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
College President Argues Against Free Speech on Campus
By: Beldin
in POPE 5
Mon, 08 Apr 19 11:11 PM
Msg. 29746 of 62138

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/04/08/college-president-argues-against-free-speech-on-campus/

Union College President David R. Harris recently penned an argument against free speech on college campuses, claiming that institutions of higher learning have a responsibility to manage speech by providing "constructive engagement," so that students can have an optimal learning experience.

Union College president David R. Harris penned an op-ed, entitled, "A Campus Is Not the Place for Free Speech," in which he argues that it is the role of colleges and universities to filter the conversations on campuses to provide "constructive engagement."

"I oppose free speech on college campuses," states Harris in his op-ed, "I think college campuses should be safe havens from voices on the left and right that violate what I have learned and what I believe." ...

Well, David ... you pathetic lil' Nazi ... here's where your pitiful pea-brain slipped a cog:

1. Free speech is the LAW OF THE LAND ... not just portions of it that you do not control ... ALL OF IT, you f**king retard. You should read The U.S. Constitution sometime, David ... Nazis like you, of course, find it infuriatingly enlightening, but enlightening, nonetheless.

2. You cannot have constructive engagement between people unless each side is free to express themselves. If the conversation is restricted and managed, then whoever is the master manipulator has short-circuited whatever connection might be had between the parties.

3. And speaking of master manipulators ... did you look at what you wrote, David?

"I oppose free speech on college campuses," states Harris in his op-ed, "I think college campuses should be safe havens from voices on the left and right that violate what I have learned and what I believe."

"I" ... "I" ... "I" ... who the hell are you, David, eh? You narcissistically, and quite stupidly, believe yourself to be the end all and the be all, but instead, in truth, you're just a miserable lil' wanna-be tyrant who wants everyone else to bow down and agree with you. You're a petulant, insecure two-year-old trying to throw a temper tantrum. Hey, David ... eat sh!t and die, you worm. 


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next