clo banned me for that post, saying that it was "annoying."
omg, if you get banned just for being annoying, I wonder why I am still here?
-------
Joe replied after I was banned.
I didn't know that. Therefore, he didn't have to answer at all. BUT HE DID. Can't we give him one point just for trying?
---------------
His reply was insincere. He criticized my questions, calling them "statements" (An egregious error from a person who claimed to be a professional writer and historian.) and saying that I should have provided sources. Really?
---------
DE, I am not defending Joe. I'm just saying he, at least, replied, where you think it was sincere or not.
I do NOT like it when someone is asking questions and then criticizing them for any reason. This is a place for an exchange of thoughts and ideas. You and I both know that you cannot provide "sources" for questions. I was not involved in that exchange, so I can't really comment much further than that. I thought he sold insurance?
--------------
I need to provide sources for QUESTIONS now? He, not I, was the one claiming authority status.
Nobody, but NOBODY, is an expert on global warming/CLIMATE CHANGE because nobody can definitively argue its point when WE DON'T KNOW the end result of warming/cooling. Everyone is basically guessing, imo. But that bitch had better not take my burgers. How could he be an authority figure? HE CAN'T.
---------
He also referred me to an extinct board and said that its thousands of wiped-out messages would have answered my questions. That was a copout. It is the type of thing that people do when they are outgunned and know it.
Oh yeah, extinct boards are very helpful. HUH? I don't know which board he was referring to, but if it was not an active board, in addition to not having any posts, then I agree that was a copout. ANYONE WHO HAS THE NERVE to go against your arguments is definitely outgunned. You used to intimidate me, that's for sure! I mean that in the nicest of ways; however, now that I know you're funny, you are aces with me. I am such a brown-noser. In the end, I just feel that all of this climate change tawk is BULLSHIT. As soon as we got to "cow farts," I was DONE.
----------
You remember Joe. When's the last time you remember him posting ANYTHING half as short as that response? LOL.
----------
I remember his name. Seems we were posting on the same board years ago. But, I do not remember specific postings of his.
You're giving me more "memory credit" than I deserve.
I don't remember any of his specific posts, but while I do give him some credit for a lame response, and lame it was, I don't see the value of removing someone with legitimate questions from a dead board.
It's more fun here anyway, DE.
SEVEN years later and we're still discussing what you (and Joe) talked about in reference to global warming.
Makes me think discussing it is a waste of time.
I still think your post and your questions were excellent. Wish I had been there to partake, as in eating a cupcake or drinking a bottle of booze. This subject does not interest me as much as others, but it still would have been worth it to me to state my position and have Joe respond.
Pretty serious shid for a Sunday morning!
RIBIT, WHEN IS NO PANTS DAY???
Tawk soon, DE
| 
