Agreed, De.
I am always willing to entertain a truthful, factual, opposing viewpoint.
On a one to ten scale of 'unwilling to learn truths' . . .
With one being most willing and ten being most unwilling . . .
I'd rate OCU as a 7, Clo as a nine, and ZZ as a TEN.
Because OCU would at least pretend to ponder evidence, while finding
ways to believe the unbelievable.
Clo would mindlessly screech what her owners told her to scream.
And poor ZZ would not only believe what his owners told him to,
he would fail to read and understand what he posted.
(OCU once told me a chemical warhead wasn't really a chemical
warhead because it was empty. Clo would never endingly screech
'Saddam had no WMD's. And ZZ once cited a supreme court decision
claiming it said guns could be outlawed - We read the article he
cited and it was upholding our Second Amendment rights.)
Zim.

Mad Poet Strikes Again.