« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Is Russia still a 'Super Power' ? 

By: ribit in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 17 Dec 18 8:05 PM | 56 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 17113 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 17080 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...maybe their problem is in their catapault system itsef.

Uploaded Image

...ya think?




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Is Russia still a 'Super Power' ?
By: Zimbler0
in POPE 5
Mon, 17 Dec 18 3:02 AM
Msg. 17080 of 62138

Naval Air: Where The Future Is Failure

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htnavai/20181215.aspx

December 15, 2018: At the end of October 2018 Russia lost the use of its only aircraft carrier (the Kuznetsov) when the largest floating dry dock in Russia, PD-50, had an accident and sank. Kuznetsov was in PD-50 at the time but got free and stayed afloat with some damage from a collapsing crane. The PD-50 sank in deep water off the north coast near Murmansk. That is where Kuznetsov is based along with the rest of the northern fleet. The PD-50 was the only Russian dry dock that could hold the Kuznetsov. Salvage experts fear it may be too expensive to raise the dry dock and repair it. Even if that worked it would take at least a year. There are other foreign dry docks that could hold Kuznetsov but because of sanctions the only ones Russia has access to are in China and those are busy building new carriers for the Chinese fleet, which now has two with a third under construction. The navy cannot afford to buy a new dry dock and admitted that this is the end of the line for the Kuznetsov, which is overdue for some major maintenance and refurbishment. The dry dock Kuznetsov was built in is in the Ukraine, which Russia is at war with.

Many Russians saw the loss of PD-50 as just another example of the sloppiness and poor management that have crippled the military industries and the space program over the last two decades.

. . . . (Skip Some) . . .

For years the state-controlled media played down the fact that the Kuznetsov was kept operational more as a status symbol than as a useful warship. For example in early 2017 Kuznetsov completed its longest and busiest cruise yet, spending 117 days at sea and carrying out 420 aircraft takeoffs using its Su-33s and MiG-29Ks jets. Some of those flights were for combat missions in Syria. That level of activity comes out to 3.6 fixed-wing aircraft operations per day. While doing that two jets were lost.

. . .

An American carrier averages about 24 catapult assisted aircraft operations a day. The accident rate is much lower than what the Russians experienced.

>>>

Zim : Yes, recognize that the Russkies averaged only 3.6 sorties a day . . .
Where the American carriers average 24 a day - roughly seven times as many.
And We got ten of these beasts operational - versus Russkies with - NONE.

(Some was skipped. Article does continue. Link is at the top. Zim.)



« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next