![]() |
|
|
The above list shows replies to the following message: |
|
Msg. 05787 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 05765 by Zimbler0) |
Zimbler0: Liberal proponents of the study want to see what free money will do to people - specifically to very poor people. Critics argue that UBI will sap the recipients of their desire to work. Proponents say the opposite. Since the study is almost certainly going to be limited to impoverished people, it would be misleading to say that this will be a test of true UBI. What the study will be testing is whether $6,000/year with no strings attached will result in people currently on welfare seeking jobs, whereas they currently don't because they'd lose their welfare money and can't find a job that pays enough to be worth risking that. So that's the point of the study. I suppose it might be worthwhile to know the answer. To answer your question of who would pay for a full-scale implementation of UBI: Corporations. If robots are destined to take over most jobs, then corporations will be the beneficiaries of the technology and would be the logical choice. In fact, heavy taxes levied against robot-using corporations might even incentivize them to hire humans instead. For a while, anyway. IMO, hundreds of millions of American jobs ARE going to be lost to automation and UBI will therefore be inevitable. If you and I live long enough, we'll see it happen. Some say the job losses to automation and robots will be a huge issue as soon as 2025. I don't know about that, but I'd be surprised if full-scale UBI isn't here within twenty years.
Not a good thing, btw. Its implementation will reflect the horrendous job climate that's going to exist. It will mean that nearly everyone will be very, very poor. And then, one day, corporations will find a way to stop paying. ![]() Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months |
|
|
|
|
© Webpage Design Copyright 2003-2011 http://www.atomicbobs.com/
|