« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...

By: zzstar in BAF | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 09 Mar 18 7:57 AM | 84 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 01380 of 06531
(This msg. is a reply to 01379 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Did you read what I wrote, asshat, which is exactly what you repeated? Which you also failed to understand that it says “for self protection in the home�, AND UNLOADED, AND NOTHING ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE!

Which is why I call you ZIMDIOT!


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
By: Zimbler0
in BAF
Fri, 09 Mar 18 7:52 AM
Msg. 01379 of 06531

>>
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
>>


ZZ,
You obviously failed to read and understand the article you posted a link to. Twice it said this :

>>
The Supreme Court struck down provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional,
>>

And, from late in the article :

>>
Decision

The Supreme Court held:[45]
(1) The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.
>>


To put it more exactly, the article you posted a link
to states that the Supreme Court has ruled that the
individuals right to bear arms shall not be abridged.

Take your time going back to the link and re-reading it.

Zim.


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next