« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: M16 rifle 

By: Zimbler0 in BAF | Recommend this post (2)
Thu, 08 Mar 18 11:58 PM | 18 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 01381 of 02804
(This msg. is a reply to 01378 by zzstar)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

zzshart > I am not ignorant. I JUST DON’T GIVE A SHIT.


ZZ,
Apparently you are ignorant because you don't care.

And you need to carefully re-read that Heller case.
Because the article you posted a link to says the
opposite of what you claim it says.

Zim.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: M16 rifle
By: zzstar
in BAF
Thu, 08 Mar 18 8:58 PM
Msg. 01378 of 02804

Don”t really care what you held, nor care to remember what I held. It is an experiencing I took very little from, and hoped to never repeat it. I don’t give a shit about guns, assault weapons, bullets, calibers, and all that shit.

I am not ignorant. I JUST DON’T GIVE A SHIT. And I do not care to learn anything more about it. It is one of the most boring subjects on my list.

As for the Supremes, they have not banned AR 15s specifically, but have only ruled in Heller for guns and long rifles, and Scalia went on to say that there is no right for such weapons in tne Constitution, and that no right is absolute, and that guns can be REGULATED.

Clear as a bell. I don’t speak in haste, but you seem to not understand context from the Supremes.

Again, all efforts since then to have the Supremes rule specifically and allow constitutionally AR 15s and similar weapons, have been DENIED!!!!

Congress let the BAN ON SUCH WEAPONS EXPIRE, AND the Supremes may eventually kill them for good, SOECIFICALLY!



« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next