Is it possible ... did some nefarious cad hack her "Panty Buster"?! I think the fibbies need to recheck Carlos Danger's laptop, don'tcha know. He might be attempting to "over stimulate" poor lil' ol' Claudia!
A Remote-Controlled Sex Toy Exposed 50,000 People's Sex Lives, Says Security Company
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/01/remote-controlled-sex-toy-exposes-sex-life/
A female-oriented sex toy emphatically called the "Panty Buster" - which has several advanced capabilities, like wireless connectivity - is riddled with vulnerabilities, according to a security consulting company's findings published Thursday.
The Panty Buster "takes care of sensual moments day by day" by simultaneously triggering "a g-spot-punctual and vaginal simulation" and by letting users control the synced-app "from home or from the other end of the world," according to Vibratissimo, the company offering the product. ...
According to Forbes ...
Remote control of the toy without consent was possible thanks to a flawed feature, SEC explained. When Vibratissimo users want to allow someone far away to control the Panty Buster, they have the app create a link, which is then sent to the partner. But those links are easy to guess and the toy owner isn't asked to confirm they want another person to take over. "The attacker could simply guess this predictable ID in order to control the victim directly," SEC noted.
To prove how simple it was to take control of the device via this method, SEC produced a video:
{Embedded Video}
http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2018/02/01/vibratissimo-panty-buster-sex-toy-multiple-vulnerabilities/#589329525a94
| 
