« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The Strange Case of Trent Franks 

By: lkorrow in POPE IV | Recommend this post (2)
Sat, 09 Dec 17 2:44 PM | 94 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 39888 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 39848 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

This is a plot by the Left to get Trump. A friend said it, then I began seeing the evidence. First, casual references to him, then a Breitbart article saying it's a plot, and last night, Bernie Sanders calling for his resignation.

They may also be hoping to change the mix in the Congress to gain a Democratic majority.

I don't like the conduct of these people in the office or by a married man. But I believe it's an existential threat to the nation if the commie/fascist left get Trump or a majority. Consequently, my feeling is not one Republican (except McCain) should resign. If they apologize, that is. Then, if they pull anything else, nail them. Meanwhile, let the voters decide.

The good news is going forward, they're just not going to get away with it. And they should be required to take classes, every one of them, on what is and isn't sexual harassment (or worse) and what the ramifications to them are. These power trips where these Congressman feel a need to harass or whatever need to stop.

I was impressed with Franks, I think he was a real worker (my experience only one panel discussion). Very disappointed he resigned, effective Friday. His wife went into the hospital for a pre-existing ailment. Very unfortunate to lose him, is my impression.

I don't like the Speaker. It has often seemed like he was on the other side.




Avatar




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The Strange Case of Trent Franks
By: Beldin
in POPE IV
Sat, 09 Dec 17 2:23 AM
Msg. 39848 of 47202

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/12/the-strange-case-of-trent-franks.php

By Paul Mirengoff
Power Line
December 8, 2017

Rep. Trent Franks, an Arizona Republican, is resigning from the House. He came under pressure to resign from Speaker Paul Ryan after it was revealed that he asked two staffers if they would bear his child.

Franks says that he and his wife have long struggled with infertility. After having twins with a surrogate, the couple wanted additional children. He viewed the staffers as potential surrogates.

Franks' conduct towards the two staffers was certainly inappropriate. His request may not have created a hostile work environment, but it must have created a strange and uncomfortable one, at least for a time.

However, assuming Franks didn't seek sexual relations with his staffers and didn't pressure them, his inappropriate requests do not strike me as sufficient reason for him to leave the House. Franks says he did neither of these things and, so far, I've seen no indication to the contrary.

Not all inappropriate conduct towards women justifies dismissal. If Congress doesn't figure this out soon, we will see a mass exodus.

Speaker Ryan played a major role in pushing Franks out the door. According to his account, he confronted Franks with the surrogacy allegations, told Franks he should resign, and said he would refer the matter to the House Ethics Committee.

Ryan explained that he "takes seriously his obligation to ensure a safe workplace in the House." That's great. Where, though, is the evidence that Franks created an unsafe workplace?

Did Ryan push Franks out because he wanted to grand stand - to one-up Nancy Pelosi, who was slow to pull the trigger on the odious John Conyers? Did Ryan push Franks out because Franks, an arch-conservative and member of the Freedom Caucus, is a thorn in his side?

I don't know, but the questions are legitimate, it seems to me.


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next