... the real reason behind the "man-made global warming scam" - wealth redistribution with the political elites skimming a deep layer off the top for themselves.
World View: African Leaders Once Again Furious That They Won't Get a Climate Change Bonanza
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/11/18/18-nov-17-world-view-african-leaders-once-again-furious-that-they-wont-get-a-climate-change-bonanza/
The latest annual United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP23, ended on Friday accomplishing nothing but a new collection of news stories about politicians from countries around the world taking credit for climate change leadership, and expressing outrage that Donald Trump announced that he was leaving the previous climate change agreement, and thereby allowing the world to slide into planetary climate disaster. ...
{These con artists are screaming because President Trump is wisely taking away the cash-cow (i.e., the American people) from this pathetic scam.}
African leaders were furious at last year's climate change conference because Donald Trump had unexpectedly won the US presidential election and said that he would pull out of the climate change agreement. Even so, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged a rapid scale-up in funding for climate change programs, especially to support developing countries. "Finance and investment hold the key to achieving low-emissions and resilient societies," he said.
{Ah, yes ... "urging a rapid scale-up in funding," eh? Yep, the scamster cockroaches want to fraudulently steal as much money as they can grab before their con-game completely implodes.}
So now it is a year later, and there's another climate change conference, and African leaders are furious again because there were plenty of promises made this week, but no commitments.
Africans claim that they are entitled to money because they are the victims of climate change. That is, the West has caused the climate change, and the Africans are suffering because of it. ...
{No, the only thing you ne'er-do-wells are a victim of is your own worthless laziness and corruption. This segues right into zzshart's complete misunderstanding of 2 Thessalonians 3:10 at the BAF Board ... there is a huge difference between being physically unable to work and being unwilling to work. Christ said, "You will always have the poor among you..." And, I know that He wants us to be generous with those who are unfortunate to have little or nothing ... and Christians have been and continue to be giving untold BILLIONS in charitable aid to the needy in the United States and in foreign countries. However, there is another old adage that did not come from Biblical text that is also highly appropriate - "Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime." A tremendous amount of charitable monetary aid from Christians has been spent with this very idea in mind - helping to build infrastructure, buying farm animals and seed for crops, building schools to provide life-changing education, etc. So, what do we clearly see from the teachings of Christ, his Apostles, and the Old Testament? Yes, we need to take care of the poor ... especially those who do not have the ability to fend for themselves - widows, orphans, the elderly, the infirm - but, for those who are currently poor but have the ability to work, they MUST show a willingness to work ... to strive ... to take up the responsibility for providing for themselves and their families. Receiving charity is NOT an excuse to lazily sit back and expect that someone else is somehow wholly responsible for your well-being from cradle to grave. Therefore, it is wholly acceptable and right to expect those who are able to work - and are unwilling to do so - should not be given food, shelter, and material goods for nothing.
But, the true, underlying issue in this whole discussion for Socialist/Marxist libtards like zzshart has nothing whatsoever to do with actually helping the poor ... or, even the poor, themselves ... because they are simply a hapless tool for libtards. No, the true issue is that libtards don't like the fact that Christian donors get to choose where to donate their money and how it is used. Libtards want to control the whole process of "charitable giving" from start to finish. They want to arbitrarily decide how much is confiscated and from whom (so they can financially punish their enemies) for their "charitable purposes" via taxation. They want to control how these confiscated funds are spent and who it is given to, in an authoritarian manner, so as to create a dependent class of people who are helplessly indebted to supporting the continuing political power of their libtard "benefactors" - "benefactors" who, like drug dealers, have maliciously gotten these people addicted to the continuation of these handouts of other people's money. And, the libtards have a very keen interest in expanding the ranks of this addicted class of people; therefore, the libtards easily dismiss any thought about the willingness to work because they don't want any of the victims on their Socialist/Marxist plantation to discover that they might very well be far better off if they become responsible citizens who strive and fend for themselves. Once the libtards capture and enslave these poor people in "victimhood," they don't want them to break their addiction - because this class of "victims" is the libtard power base.}
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
