« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: waaaaaaaaa babies/liers... BOMBSHELL: New Report Shows Guccifer 2.0-DNC Files Were Copied Locallyâ�&iuml

By: monkeytrots in POPE IV | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 12 Jul 17 5:50 AM | 59 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 28967 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 28966 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

True, Zim - over INTERNAL direct connect giga-bit ethernet. USB 1&2 were slower (much) than most disk-to-disk (dma access) - Firewire could handle it, as could certain other 'external' devices connecting to the dma channel. As you point out - the gigabit connects would handily beat the USB downloads. Tape drives (and some optical drives) could/and do handle dma transfer rates - but NOT those that connect via USB.

Very few 'internal servers' have gigabit INTERNET (not ethernet) connections ... especially at both ends - and especially going to Roosha.

I don't see the DNC having that type of Internet backbone available to them. Google,FB,etc. - yes - in the aggregate. From a single server - and a single connection - I would highly doubt it.

Perhaps DE could weigh in on this - more up his professional alley I would think.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: waaaaaaaaa babies/liers... BOMBSHELL: New Report Shows Guccifer 2.0-DNC Files Were Copied Locallyâ�ï¿&am
By: Zimbler0
in POPE IV
Wed, 12 Jul 17 5:36 AM
Msg. 28966 of 47202

MT> Just a further refinement on my initial 'rate determination from file time stamps' ....


Just my two cents . . .
But, over a decade or so ago it was a LOT faster to
move the contents of an entire hard drive over a
good network to store it on a server computer than
it was to copy it off to a USB stick.

Recently I found that using USB-3 was a bit quicker
than moving it across a network.

A LOT will depend on the networks being used and
how busy said networks are.

Zim.


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next