Need I say more ?
Really ?
When the TWO LARGEST (Three- include Zuckeridjit of FB) SUPPORT net neutrality - something stinks, BIG TIME.
Guaranteed. Those three are looking at locking in more money, and the so-called 'net-neutrality' helps them do so. Net-Neutrality is about DESTROYING and CONTROLLING competition to those three.
If you CAN - follow the money to find the fraud. Good Luck in this case - there's a lot of BS to wade thru.
BOTTOM LINE: It is NEVER a 'good idea' for the government to get involved with 'regulating' FREE SPEECH ... or access to it. The 'unholy Trinity' ALWAYS kicks in - to our detriment (just like the DMCA digitalmillenialcopyrightact). Big Government, Big Business, Big Money - if THEY support 'it' - we had durn sure better oppose it - every time.
Brietbart sums up one of the dangers quite well:
Berin Szoka, a founder of TechFreedom a group that supports the roll back of net neutrality rules stated that the protest is “not going to stop” the FCC. “Their entire agenda is simply to jump up and down at the FCC, and jump up and down on the Hill, and try to obstruct a legislative deal,” said Szoka.
Other organizations that OPPOSE net neutrality agree. Free Our Internet says, “For the tech-left, the internet’s ability to empower individuals, uphold freedom of speech, and protect the diversity of ideas is a direct threat to their political power and control. Control the medium, and you control the message. By controlling the internet in all of its facets, they hope to be the gatekeepers of the political discourse and ideas that travel through it.”
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan_ or email him at lnolan@breitbart.com
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/07/11/google-and-amazon-join-net-neutrality-protest/

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...