« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: When it comes to Military Aircraft 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE IV | Recommend this post (5)
Tue, 04 Jul 17 5:33 AM | 96 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 28375 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 28360 by lkorrow)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>>
Did China Just Make ALL Stealth Fighters (Think the F-22 and F-35) Obsolete?
>>


Naah.
The guys are working on a thing called 'JASSM ER'.

>>>
https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairw/articles/20170703.aspx

Growing demand from nervous allies confronting ominous moves by Russia, China, North Korea and Iran have led to increased production of the American AGM-158 JASSM (Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles). The latest production order in mid-2017 was for 360 more of the most expensive version; AGM-158B JASSM ER (extended range of 900 kilometers). These will cost $1.15 million each and be delivered by mid-2020. Since it entered production in 2009 over 3,000 JASSM have been ordered, including 910 of JASSM ER. Basically JASSM delivers a GPS guided bomb long distances (beyond the range of enemy air defenses) and does it relatively inexpensively.

>>>

(Article does continue. Zim.)




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: When it comes to Military Aircraft
By: lkorrow
in POPE IV
Tue, 04 Jul 17 3:56 AM
Msg. 28360 of 47202

Ribit,

F35 Stealth - They're not totally invisible, but its hard to trace the dots to them. Meanwhile, our enemies are busily pursuing new radar systems to detect them.

An F-35 pilot explains why Russia and China's counterstealth can't stop him
http://www.businessinsider.com/f-35-russia-china-radar-counter-stealth-2017-5

Did China Just Make ALL Stealth Fighters (Think the F-22 and F-35) Obsolete?
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/did-china-just-make-all-stealth-fighters-think-the-f-22-f-35-19608

EMP Anti-aircraft Shell

As far as I know, an Electromagnetic pulse explosion is the result of a nuclear bomb exploding. When we tested nukes in the Pacific, some electronics in Hawaii were impacted (est 2500 miles away). What they have done in the meantime is produce nuclear weapons that improve on the EMP effect of nukes by making the bombs higher energy and lower yield. And instead of dropping them low to destroy more, they shoot them up higher in the atmosphere to broaden their range. This also reduces the radiation from the nuclear explosion.

I can't picture such an anti-aircraft shell, but it's an interesting proposition. Could such a thing be built with a fairly close-proximity effect to use offshore as a missile defense system and not hurt the oceans? I have no idea.

Well, one thing I have discovered from our discussion out here on the F-35 is I don't need to go talk to anyone about design issues like a dogfight capability, because there's a lot of people out there debating it already. I do have to question the logic in making a plane that can't be flown on manual by the pilot and whose machine gun can't work without software in the age of cyber warfare.


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next