« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Follow the money - in fraud, politics, and war 

By: lkorrow in POPE IV | Recommend this post (6)
Mon, 19 Jun 17 10:50 AM | 226 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 27178 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 27151 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

mt, I'm not at all close to healthcare other than getting creamed paying for what's not covered, but it doesn't resonate that the insurance companies are the beneficiaries. If so, they wouldn't have bailed out. Demonized politicians, I'll buy.




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Follow the money - in fraud, politics, and war
By: monkeytrots
in POPE IV
Mon, 19 Jun 17 3:43 AM
Msg. 27151 of 47202

Ignore 'power, ideas, talk of freedom,...' and all else.

Hussein.Ø Care - Who have been the largest recipients of MONEY ?

The consumer of health care - via subsidies, or increases in either quality or quantity of care ?

Nope. Do I really need to elaborate for those on this board ... not by a long mile.

The real beneficiary(s) of HØ-care have been, by FAR, the insurance companies ... and demonazi politicians.

Ignore the profit/loss statements of the so-called 'insurance companies'- too freaking easy to lie through their teeth on 'losing money' on profit/loss statements. They have uniformly increased their cash flow from 'operations' by a factor of 4-5 through increased premiums, being able to pass the blame (and cost) on increased guv regulation. Plus, add in a trillion or so dollars of direct government subsidies.
When reporting, do the companies simply report loss by comparing payouts to premiums - or do they report total income (premiums + investment income from those premiums) vs. payouts. Just one of many ways to lie to Congress and U.S. about whether they are losing money or not ? Dropping out of many markets ? Is it due to actual losses - or because those markets offer a lower ROR on their operations vs. other markets.
Another way to 'lie'- and unless you have a doctorate in money laundering, the power to seize records world-wide (not just in the US), and a couple million accountants working nonstop- you will never be able to get the true picture.

#2 recipient - DemoNazi (and repug-lican) pols. They have bought over 5.0 million votes at the polls - without having cost their own private coffers a single dime for these direct bribes.

That is just a small taste 0f 'Follow the Money'. Apply the same to SJW, Bezos (his real opposition to Trump is based on anti-trust actions that Trump threatened against Bezos- actions that should be taken.) Bezos == WaPo. Pretty straight forward there. Ditto for google, apple, most of silicon valley - their opposition is based on MONEY (gov conracts, cheap and illegal foreign workers being imported, etc.) , not based on 'ideology'. Ditto for Zucker-idjit- no real interest in FREE SPEECH - he is about MONEY, and operating in as many countries world-wide as possible (increased ads, increased money) irrespective of any onerous 'speech' nazi-ism he has to impose in order to maintain his 'markets'.

HRC - Pay for Play - no audit EVER by independent, outside auditors, as required for 501-a,b,c,d,e....xyz 'corps'. Millions, if not Billions, of dollars.

Bernie Sanders and his supporters - being bought and paid for (both Sanders and minions) with OPM - other people's money - meaning you and me - at the gunpoint of the Federale bludgeon ... aka. the current Police State - also known as the 'deep state'.

When it comes to foreign wars - the money gets harder to trace - because there are so many complicit in promoting wars - and they all participate in obfuscating and burying the truth.

Syria - could it be as simple as the 'two pipeline' theory ? Yeah - it could be - but there is a far higher probability that much more money is involved.

Ditto on Iran - Yeah it could be 'well they are the #1 supporter of terrorism ....but what of Saudi Arabia ? Yeah, they have a nuclear program - want to wipe Israel off the map. BUT - WHO PUT THE ISLAMISTS IN POWER IN IRAN ? Remember who - ONE MAN - Jimmy Carter. Who benefited - who made money, oil, military equipment, and otherwise ?

Libya - an OIL GIANT - A country whose leader got set back on his ass by Ronald Reagan and a squadron of F-111's - a leader who abandoned his chemical weapons and nuclear program development (being paid for by Sodamn Insane) WITHOUT SHOTS BEING FIRED under the GWB regime - and had pretty much ceased funding international terrorists - although still offering sanctuary (as all the MidEast Countries do) to SOME.
What was the rational for removing a previous arch-nemesis who had already been pretty damn well effectively muzzled.

Does 'Follow the Money' apply - with HRC, Hussein.Ø et .al. still apply ? Well -where did the weapons(billions of dollars), money, and gold end up ?
Who was and IS still a huge source behind HRC H.Ø etal. ? Hint: Huma Abeden is a known member of Muslim Brotherhood - with direct ties to the highest echelons (and money) in that 'organization'.

Like I said: Follow the Money.


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next