« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Even Dershowitz - flaming liberal - calls this witch hunt - STALIN POLICE STATE tactics  

By: lkorrow in POPE IV | Recommend this post (8)
Sat, 17 Jun 17 10:43 AM | 181 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 27077 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 27049 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

If Trump doesn't go after Comey, Clinton and Obama, I think he'd be making a big mistake. Where's Giuliani when ya need him?

It's ironic, the Republicans didn't impeach Obama because they thought they'd have partisan retribution. Now, they've got it anyway and they let Obama and Clinton off the hook.




Avatar




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Even Dershowitz - flaming liberal - calls this witch hunt - STALIN POLICE STATE tactics
By: monkeytrots
in POPE IV
Sat, 17 Jun 17 4:04 AM
Msg. 27049 of 47202

On an interview on CNN a a week or so ago - BEFORE even Comey's testimony. Summarized by PJMEDIA - not gonna link to CNN for squat - unless absolutely needed.

Alan Dershowitz: Russia Probe Sounds Like Stalin's Secret Police
By Debra Heine May 26, 2017

Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz said Thursday that the Russia probe was “being done backwards” in a manner comparable to Stalin’s secret police.

Dershowitz appeared on CNN with legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin to discuss the special prosecutor's investigation and breaking news about the FBI's scrutiny of Jared Kushner.

...

“Usually, you can point to a statute and say, ‘We’re investigating crime under this statute,'” Dershowitz said. “What Mueller seems to be doing is saying, ‘We don’t like what happened. Maybe there was some collaboration. But I can’t figure out what statute was being violated.’ You know, when Hillary Clinton was being investigated, at least we knew what the statute was.”

Toobin chimed in, "Here's a statute...want a statute? Aiding and abetting hacking -- it's a crime."

"Oh, come on!" Dershowitz exclaimed. "You have to show evidence. You're just making that up! You have to show evidence. Not only that they knew about the hacking, but they worked hand and glove with them. You're just making it up! There's no evidence of any crime. I searched the statute. I cannot find it!"

"Jeffrey, do you really believe that anybody in the Trump campaign worked with the Russians and told them to target the DNC, to tell them how to do it, that they facilitated that?" Dershowitz challenged his former student. "I think the worst-case scenario is that they were like Wikileaks and the Washington Post...."

"I don't know!" Toobin laughed defensively.

"You don't know!" the famous liberal law professor exclaimed. "But that's not the basis for having a criminal investigation!" 

"For example, you had the candidate Trump saying, 'Go Wikileaks!'" Tobin offered -- as if Trump's bombast and bluster on the campaign trail were somehow evidence of collusion. "Is that enough evidence for you, Alan?" he asked weakly.

"Does that sound like a crime to you?" Dershowitz shot back. “I don’t like criminal investigations to start on hoping that you have the target, maybe we’ll find the crime, maybe we’ll find the statute – and if we can’t find the statute, we’ll stretch the statute to fit the person," Dersh said.

"That sounds like Lavrentiy Beria [Joseph Stalin’s secret police chief] and Joseph Stalin! he added. "'Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime.' I don't want to ever see that come to America."
 


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next