Oh, Mr.Wizard - wasn't in any way accusing you of head hunting - appreciated the news. It took some effort to put my mind in gear to 'dig' on what that article was really saying, what evidence they actually produced, and that caused me to really question the article - since their evidence was soooooo limited.
Yes, it might be true, but when 'biased and poor methods' are used to report, red flags must IMMEDIATELY go up. Regrettably, it was not 'immediate' with me -it took me two times through.
Yes - the claim is made that podcasts are available.
Isn't it interesting that the article makes no attempt to link to those pod-casts, nor even tell one where they are located (another bias method - few, if any, people will go to the effort of hunting down further information, especially if they aren't even given a place to go for more.)
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...
| 