« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court Could Fire Jack Smith from Special Counsel Role 

By: ribit in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Mon, 06 May 24 2:15 AM | 18 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 52908 of 53276
(This msg. is a reply to 52907 by De_Composed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...jack smith should be in jail.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Supreme Court Could Fire Jack Smith from Special Counsel Role
By: De_Composed
in 6TH POPE
Mon, 06 May 24 1:28 AM
Msg. 52907 of 53276

I do believe that clo's head will do a full rotation when she sees this.


May 5, 2024

Supreme Court Could Fire Jack Smith from Special Counsel Role

by Nick R. Hamilton
SlayNews.com



Justices on the United States Supreme Court appear to be considering that Jack Smith could be fired from his powerful role as special counsel on the Jan. 6 case.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas appears to be open to the idea that Smith’s appointment as special counsel was unconstitutional.

The SCOTUS is currently hearing arguments from President Donald Trump’s lawyers that his alleged misconduct was covered by presidential immunity.

Furthermore, Trump’s lawyers are arguing that Jack Smith’s appointment as a special counsel is illegitimate on constitutional grounds.

During a hearing, Thomas asked Trump’s attorney John Sauer:

“Do you, in this litigation, challenge the appointment of special counsel?”

Sauer responded by saying that they “have done so in the Southern District of Florida case.”

“We totally agree with the analysis provided by Attorney General Meese and Attorney General Mukasey,” he added.

Meese and Mukasey are former attorney generals who filed an amicus brief on Trump’s behalf.

Thomas’s inquiry makes it clear that he has read the brief.

It also suggests that Thomas is considering the possibility that Smith’s appointment violated the Constitution’s appointments clause.

If Thomas is asking these questions, it is very likely that the rest of the Supreme Court’s bench will be considering these arguments as the case goes on.

The appointments clause states that the president “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States.”

http://slaynews.com/news/supreme-court-could-fire-jack-smith-special-counsel-role/


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next