« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Real News veteran Dan Rather’s argument for DC statehood ‘is probably the dumbest spin on this issue yet’ 

By: Beldin in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 04 May 21 7:34 PM | 26 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 16776 of 53181
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Uploaded Image

http://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2021/05/03/real-news-veteran-dan-rathers-argument-for-dc-statehood-is-probably-the-dumbest-spin-on-this-issue-yet/

Opponents of statehood for Washington, D.C. are so dumb, aren’t they? Imagine thinking that we can’t have more than 50 states in the Union. Only a total moron would believe that.

Know who’s not a total moron? Dan Rather. Yeah, see, unlike all you rubes, Dan Rather understands how things work in this country:

Dan Rather ~ The idea that you can’t add states to the Union is pretty much undercut by a flag with more than 13 stars.

Apparently Dan here thinks that just because he’s been alive since there were 13 stars on the flag means he knows what the hell he’s talking about.

We may be generalizing, but we’re pretty sure that literally no one’s argument against D.C. statehood is that we can’t add states to the Union. Guess Dan Rather’s tweet is what happens when you can’t make a good case for D.C. statehood and thus have to manufacture a nonexistent case against it.

Nwlaguy ~ No one is making that argument.

You Should Have Voted For Jo ~ I have not seen a single human being say that we can't add more states.

M Gfunk ~ No one is saying that, no one.

Eric Spencer ~ When you can't address the actual issue, a straw man will do in a pinch.

Dan does love a good straw man ...

Joe Cunningham ~ This is probably the dumbest spin on this issue yet, but Dan Rather likes going above and beyond.

Dumb spin may be the one thing Dan’s actually good at.

DaveinTexas ~ That isn't the argument being made. The argument is the problem of creating a "super-state" that is also the seat of federal power. See Madison, Federalist 43.

Amy Dupler ~ Making DC a state was NEVER the intent by our Founding Fathers or they would have done it. Do you need a pocket copy of the Constitution, Dan???

Brad Slager- AKA 'Brad Eagle', formerly 'The Crow' ~ Nobody is saying you cannot add states, Dan.
They are saying the Constitution outlines why D.C. cannot be added as a state.

Maybe the font on the founding document is throwing you off ...?

Joe Cunningham ~ No one is saying “You can’t add more states.” Several of the Founders planned for it. But they also SPECIFICALLY framed the idea that the seat of the federal government should be separate from any state.

Isn’t it Dan Rather’s job to know things like this?

Well, yeah, it should be, but Dan would rather just make crap up than spend any time or effort actually gathering facts. 

Nathan Wurtzel ~ You can. There is a Constitutional method. Follow it. And stop lying.

Dan can’t stop — and he won’t stop.

Too true. Dan Blather can't and won't stop lying - that's who he is. 

Joe Cunningham ~ If you want to argue the issue legitimately, I’ll disagree with you but be respectful about it. If you want to be a dishonest, historically ignorant ass, you deserve to be treated as such and nothing more.




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next