He has denied point blank that he behaved in the way described.
Some of his defenders, including csl, say K can be forgiven on grounds of youthful indiscretion.
Trouble with that defence - it assumes he is currently lying. You can't admit a liar to the Supreme Court. So the defence itself is disqualifying. Not to worry, though. Once these folks realise they have made such a horrendous gaffe, they'll simply find a new argument.