Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: BELIEF IN PALESTINIAN OPENNESS  

By: micro in BAF | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 12 Jun 18 6:41 PM | 49 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter 		Msg. 02365 of 06525
(This msg. is a reply to 02359 by Zimbler0)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

My opinion of the middle east is that there will never be peace there because the BIBLE is quite clear on that subject and the day to day , year to year, actions of all the Arab nations around Israel proclaiming that until Israel is wiped from the face of the earth, there will be no peace.

Peace will happen eventually. But it will not bode well for all those who are attempting to assault Israel militarily in the valley of Meggido for the destruction of Israel.

THIS STRUGGLE has been ongoing since Abraham banished Ishmael and his mother from his encampment. There will never be peace between these peoples.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
BELIEF IN PALESTINIAN OPENNESS
By: Zimbler0 in BAF
Fri, 08 Jun 18 11:11 PM 		Msg. 02359 of 06525

BELIEF IN PALESTINIAN OPENNESS TO TWO-STATE SOLUTION AMOUNTS TO INSANITY

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Belief-in-Palestinian-openness-to-two-state-solution-amounts-to-insanity-514856

I never thought I would concur with anything written by veteran Israeli “peace” activist Uri Avnery, but I find myself in full agreement with his recent prognosis that “sheer stupidity plays a major role in the history of nations” and that the longstanding rejection of the two-state solution has been nothing short of grand idiocy.

But it is here that our consensus ends. For rather than look at the historical record of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and draw the self-evident conclusions, Avnery retreats into the counterfactual fantasyland in which he has been living for decades. “When I pointed this out [i.e., the two-state solution], right after the 1948 war,” he writes, “I was more or less alone. Now this is a worldwide consensus, everywhere except in Israel.”

. . . . (Skip a bunch ) . . .

When in June 2009 Netanyahu broke with Likud’s ideological precept and agreed to the establishment of a Palestinian state provided it recognized Israel’s Jewish nature, PLO chief peace negotiator Saeb Erekat warned that “not in a thousand years will Netanyahu find a single Palestinian who would agree to the conditions stipulated in his speech,” while Fatah, the PLO’s largest constituent organization and Abbas’s alma mater, reaffirmed its longstanding commitment to the “armed struggle” as a strategy, not tactic, “...until the Zionist entity is eliminated and Palestine is liberated.”

. . . . .

Had Arafat set the PLO on the path to peace and reconciliation instead of turning it into one of the most murderous and corrupt terrorist organizations in modern times, a Palestinian state could have been established in the late 1960s or the early 1970s; in 1979, as a corollary to the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty; by May 1999, as part of the Oslo process; or at the very latest, with the Camp David summit of July 2000. Had Abbas abandoned his predecessors’ rejectionist path, a Palestinian state could have been established after the Annapolis summit, or during Barack Obama’s presidency.

Avnery’s failure to see this stark historical record for what it is, and his unwavering belief in Palestinian openness to the two-state solution, may not qualify as idiocy, yet surely conforms to Albert Einstein’s famous definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

>>>>>

(Complete article is at the link.)
(As I believe I've said before, there will be no
peace in the Middle East until the Palestinians explicitly
recognize Israel's right to exist. Zim.)

« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next