« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it... 

By: Zimbler0 in BAF | Recommend this post (2)
Sat, 10 Mar 18 12:02 AM | 41 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 01409 of 06525
(This msg. is a reply to 01380 by zzstar)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

zzshart > Did you read what I wrote, asshat, which is exactly what you repeated? Which you also failed to understand that it says “for self protection in the home”, AND UNLOADED, AND NOTHING ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE!


No, ZZ.
The article said the exact opposite.
What it said was that Washington D.C. passed a law
claiming what you appear to want . . .
And the Supreme Court struck down that law as
Un-Constitutional. On the grounds that people do have
a right to own fire-arms.

The word 'unloaded' was from the D.C. law. Stricken down.

By the way, from a Constitutional standpoint no Judge
has any right to 'create law'.

Nor should they.
(Care to try explaining why they should?)

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
By: zzstar
in BAF
Fri, 09 Mar 18 7:57 AM
Msg. 01380 of 06525

Did you read what I wrote, asshat, which is exactly what you repeated? Which you also failed to understand that it says “for self protection in the home”, AND UNLOADED, AND NOTHING ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE!

Which is why I call you ZIMDIOT!


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next