« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it... 

By: Zimbler0 in BAF | Recommend this post (3)
Fri, 09 Mar 18 8:02 AM | 52 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 01383 of 06523
(This msg. is a reply to 01380 by zzstar)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>>
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

In District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (200Cool, the Supreme Court undertook its first-ever "in-depth examination" of the second amendment's meaning Id. at 635. After a lengthy historical discussion, the Court ultimately concluded that the second amendment "guarantee[s] the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation"

>>>

YOU posted the link to the article saying this.

What you wrote is a lie.
What you wrote is what you wish it said. Not what it really said.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
By: zzstar
in BAF
Fri, 09 Mar 18 7:57 AM
Msg. 01380 of 06523

Did you read what I wrote, asshat, which is exactly what you repeated? Which you also failed to understand that it says “for self protection in the home”, AND UNLOADED, AND NOTHING ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE!

Which is why I call you ZIMDIOT!


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next