« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...

By: zzstar in BAF | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 08 Mar 18 2:07 AM | 36 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 01338 of 06525
(This msg. is a reply to 01333 by micro)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Get a gun and protect yourself. Get a hunting rifle and hunt.

Other than that, NO.

Weco has posted the resuls of what Americans want by huge majorities, and I fully agree nit nly with that, but believe that in the long term it will solve much of tne problem(s). Long term means 10 years and beyond, but some of them measures will have immediate results:

RESULTS OF 5 POLLS ON GUNS:

1) Gun ownership is OK 83%

2) Ban Military Weapons 85%

3) Apply Federal Laws to Private Gun Sales 96%

4) Include Mental Illness & NO Fly Zone records in Federal Background Checks 92%

5) Minimum age 21 97%

#msg-1033236


- - - - -
View Replies (3) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
By: micro
in BAF
Wed, 07 Mar 18 11:58 PM
Msg. 01333 of 06525

ZZ

Okay. So you cannot explain the differences. MOST people cannot.

WHAT the ones who do not know anything about them worry over is a hunting rifle, made to APPEAR like a AR-15 military rifle on the outside, but it really is just a simple one trigger pull, one shot comes out, rifle. Same as used for hunting..... MO DIFFERENCE except this one has a more appealing LOOK to it.

The people who are screaming about it have no clue what they are saying or how any of this works. That is a shame.

WHAT I am in favor of is a BETTER background check to include reports of mental instability. THE criminal offenses would automatically be there if the Sheriffs office in Broward County would have ACTED only one time with that misguided murdering kid. He would have then had a record and when the background check was performed he could not have purchased a gun LEGALLY. The store would not have sold it to him.

He likely would have bought one illegally then, like all the criminals do....

If we disarm the citizens, then the criminals have nothing stopping them from robbing and shooting anyone they want....

And so the game continues......


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next