ActBlue is nothing but a Democrat scheme to launder fraudulent political donations. This is no "grass roots, small donor operation" ... it's a racket for domestic deep pockets (think George Soros, etc.) and foreign deep pockets (think Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, etc.) to circumvent the political contribution rules by pretending to be small donors.
You dingbats sure do like to scream about the evils of "Big Money" in politics, but you eagerly suck up cash from anti-American billionaires just like the $2 whores that you are.
Ya know,
Every time I read something like 'Trump calls for a bloodbath' or 'Trump gonna be a fascist dictator' I automatically assume the 'media' is LYING to me AGAIN.
Remember the 'Trump was colluding and conspiring with the Russians' thing? That made absolutely no sense whatsoever. Remember, the hildabeast is the one who sold America's uranium to Russia. No, it made no sense because PUtin would much rather have had a crooked corrupt clinton who can be bought for a few cheap chinese campaign contributions than 'America First' Donald Trump.
And the Durham report proved beyond any doubt that there was absolutely nothing truthful about the Trump collusion charge.
And then we have the Jan-6 'Armed Insurrection'. There was no armed insurrection - if there had been there would have been a LOT of bodies.
This one also made no sense - Trump supporters are just not built that way. Remember, all through 2020 it was BLM and antifa terrorists rioting and burning cities to the ground. Trump was holding rallies all over the country - and NOT a single Trump rally degenerated into looting, rioting, or arson.
Jan-6. We had 'capital police' inviting 'protestors' inside the capital building. We have reports of capital police firing 'flash bangs' into the crowd of then peaceful 'protestors'. We have turds suspected of being fbi 'special operatives' trying to incite folks into rioting and violating other laws. AND there was a lack of police presence to provide crowd control.
Add in the fact that pelosi's 'jan-6 committee' destroyed evidence and blatantly LIED to 'We The People' I am left with the opinion that what happened on Jan-6 was a deliberate scam to deprive a hundred thousand or so Trump Supporters of their Constitutional Right to assemble and announce their grievances.
Msg. 06522 of 06524 (This msg. is a reply to
06521 by
De_Composed)
Jump:
Ya know,
Every time I read something like 'Trump calls for a bloodbath' or 'Trump gonna be a fascist dictator' I automatically assume the 'media' is LYING to me AGAIN.
Remember the 'Trump was colluding and conspiring with the Russians' thing? That made absolutely no sense whatsoever. Remember, the hildabeast is the one who sold America's uranium to Russia. No, it made no sense because PUtin would much rather have had a crooked corrupt clinton who can be bought for a few cheap chinese campaign contributions than 'America First' Donald Trump.
And the Durham report proved beyond any doubt that there was absolutely nothing truthful about the Trump collusion charge.
And then we have the Jan-6 'Armed Insurrection'. There was no armed insurrection - if there had been there would have been a LOT of bodies.
This one also made no sense - Trump supporters are just not built that way. Remember, all through 2020 it was BLM and antifa terrorists rioting and burning cities to the ground. Trump was holding rallies all over the country - and NOT a single Trump rally degenerated into looting, rioting, or arson.
Jan-6. We had 'capital police' inviting 'protestors' inside the capital building. We have reports of capital police firing 'flash bangs' into the crowd of then peaceful 'protestors'. We have turds suspected of being fbi 'special operatives' trying to incite folks into rioting and violating other laws. AND there was a lack of police presence to provide crowd control.
Add in the fact that pelosi's 'jan-6 committee' destroyed evidence and blatantly LIED to 'We The People' I am left with the opinion that what happened on Jan-6 was a deliberate scam to deprive a hundred thousand or so Trump Supporters of their Constitutional Right to assemble and announce their grievances.
- - - - - The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: It is blindingly obvious to the people that worked with him that Trump should not be president again
By: De_Composed in
BAF Mon, 18 Mar 24 11:29 AM
Msg. 06518 of 06524 (This msg. is a reply to
06517 by
Decomposed)
Jump:
De
CLo's memory is as long as her hero's. Its at least 1 second..
- - - - - The above is a reply to the following message:
Biden holds a lead over Trump 50 - 44 percent among registered voters in a hypothetical general election matchup,
By: Decomposed in
BAF Sat, 03 Feb 24 10:42 AM
Re: “As signs point to the 2024 presidential election being a repeat of the 2020 race between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, Biden holds a lead over Trump 50 - 44 percent among registered voters in a hypothetical general election matchup, according to a Quinnipiac” - clo2 http://www.atomicbobs.com/index.php?mode=read&id=1237100
A new poll from Quinnipiac showing President Joe Biden leading former President Donald Trump by six points may not be as significant as some claim. While it remains to be seen how Quinnipiac’s accuracy will hold up for the 2024 election, the polling firm missed the mark over the past several election cycles.
Polling aggregator FiveThirtyEight provides several valuable measures for understanding how accurate a pollster has been in the past. According to their data, Quinnipiac ranks 15th overall by their custom rankings, which weight accuracy, number of polls conducted, and data transparency. When isolated for just accuracy, Quinnipiac ranks 36th overall. By comparison, according to FiveThirtyEight’s data, the New York Times/Siena poll is number one in both their custom rankings and by accuracy alone.
The Quinnipiac poll gives the Democrats a weighted three-point edge in the 2024 election, with the survey comprised of 32 percent registered Democrat voters, 29 percent Republican, 29 percent independent, and 10 percent who said other or do not know their affiliation. The last New York Times/Siena poll conducted in November showed Trump leading in five of the six key battleground states — indicating the former Republican President likely has a slight edge over the Democrat incumbent.
A bevy of pollsfielded just after Quinnipiac’s show Trump and Biden in a statistical tie or Trump with an edge over Biden. Only one poll from YouGov for The Economist shows Biden with a lead (1 point). The RealClearPolitics polling average still has Trump with a 1.7 percent edge over Biden — even with their aggregate incorporating the Quinnipiac poll.
Re: “As signs point to the 2024 presidential election being a repeat of the 2020 race between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, Biden holds a lead over Trump 50 - 44 percent among registered voters in a hypothetical general election matchup, according to a Quinnipiac” - clo2 http://www.atomicbobs.com/index.php?mode=read&id=1237100
A new poll from Quinnipiac showing President Joe Biden leading former President Donald Trump by six points may not be as significant as some claim. While it remains to be seen how Quinnipiac’s accuracy will hold up for the 2024 election, the polling firm missed the mark over the past several election cycles.
Polling aggregator FiveThirtyEight provides several valuable measures for understanding how accurate a pollster has been in the past. According to their data, Quinnipiac ranks 15th overall by their custom rankings, which weight accuracy, number of polls conducted, and data transparency. When isolated for just accuracy, Quinnipiac ranks 36th overall. By comparison, according to FiveThirtyEight’s data, the New York Times/Siena poll is number one in both their custom rankings and by accuracy alone.
The Quinnipiac poll gives the Democrats a weighted three-point edge in the 2024 election, with the survey comprised of 32 percent registered Democrat voters, 29 percent Republican, 29 percent independent, and 10 percent who said other or do not know their affiliation. The last New York Times/Siena poll conducted in November showed Trump leading in five of the six key battleground states — indicating the former Republican President likely has a slight edge over the Democrat incumbent.
A bevy of pollsfielded just after Quinnipiac’s show Trump and Biden in a statistical tie or Trump with an edge over Biden. Only one poll from YouGov for The Economist shows Biden with a lead (1 point). The RealClearPolitics polling average still has Trump with a 1.7 percent edge over Biden — even with their aggregate incorporating the Quinnipiac poll.
BWHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! Did you even bother to read this article?
These foreign nationals paid for "apartment and hotel stays at properties owned by Trump" - just like anyone else did who stayed there. So, this is absolutely no different than paying to stay at ... say ... The Ritz-Carlton New York, Central Park, you simpletons.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden and his family was collecting millions in return for political favors bestowed by none other than Joe Biden.
ROTFLMAO at you two! You're about as infantile as it gets.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
Msg. 06512 of 06524 (This msg. is a reply to
06510 by
Beldin)
Jump:
Mr. Wizard,
in her world and those she hangs with, the modus operandi
is: IGNORANCE is bliss.
They are a very blissful ignorant bunch, but they are happily ignorant..
- - - - - The above is a reply to the following message:
No, clo ... this is exactly the opposite of BIG GOVERNMENT
By: Beldin in
BAF Tue, 12 Dec 23 8:03 PM
Instead of wallowing in your usual ignorance, you really need to educate yourself, dearie.
This is Federalism in our Constitutional Republic. Federalism is the division and sharing of power between the national and state governments in the U.S. Constitution. Abortion is nowhere in The Constitution - period. Therefore, it is up to the states to decide how abortion will be dealt with and the voters of each state will get to weigh in on the issue. The voters of Texas did just that by electing their representatives who passed very restrictive abortion laws for the State of Texas, which is what the majority of Texans want. So, THAT is exactly what you are talking about when you constantly harp on about "democracy" - the people of Texas decided with their votes. What YOU want is for the federal government to force unrestricted abortion on everyone in all 50 states - THAT is BIG GOVERNMENT.
The beauty of Federalism is ... if you don't like the way things are done in one state ... fine ... move to another state that is more in keeping with your views. This is called FREEDOM, clo. Per the news, this woman is traveling to another state where she can have the abortion performed, which is her right to do so. The system worked as it should ... she petitioned the Texas courts, they ultimately said "no" in accordance with Texas law, and she then went to another state where they said "yes."
Your problem, clo, is that your idea of FREEDOM ... just like most Democrats ... entails YOU (or your Democrat betters) telling EVERYONE else what they can and can't do. That's not freedom - that's totalitarianism.
So, clo ... grow up, educate yourself, and quit being a hypocritical busybody who desperately feels the need to dictate your desires on everyone else.
Instead of wallowing in your usual ignorance, you really need to educate yourself, dearie.
This is Federalism in our Constitutional Republic. Federalism is the division and sharing of power between the national and state governments in the U.S. Constitution. Abortion is nowhere in The Constitution - period. Therefore, it is up to the states to decide how abortion will be dealt with and the voters of each state will get to weigh in on the issue. The voters of Texas did just that by electing their representatives who passed very restrictive abortion laws for the State of Texas, which is what the majority of Texans want. So, THAT is exactly what you are talking about when you constantly harp on about "democracy" - the people of Texas decided with their votes. What YOU want is for the federal government to force unrestricted abortion on everyone in all 50 states - THAT is BIG GOVERNMENT.
The beauty of Federalism is ... if you don't like the way things are done in one state ... fine ... move to another state that is more in keeping with your views. This is called FREEDOM, clo. Per the news, this woman is traveling to another state where she can have the abortion performed, which is her right to do so. The system worked as it should ... she petitioned the Texas courts, they ultimately said "no" in accordance with Texas law, and she then went to another state where they said "yes."
Your problem, clo, is that your idea of FREEDOM ... just like most Democrats ... entails YOU (or your Democrat betters) telling EVERYONE else what they can and can't do. That's not freedom - that's totalitarianism.
So, clo ... grow up, educate yourself, and quit being a hypocritical busybody who desperately feels the need to dictate your desires on everyone else.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbobs. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.