No, dipshit, Hillary's popular vote did not come from California alone.
This actual vote count IN EVERY STATE will help you take your head OUT OF YOUR ASS:
http://cookpolitical.com/story/10174
Read it and weep malaka. To use the summary totals from that chart here's how many the Dooche Nozzle DID NOT GET AND WHERE:
Swing states: Hillary 21,433,214 and Trump 22,249,342
Difference: 816,248 for Trump
Non swing states: Hillary 44,411,380, Trump 40,730,274
Difference: 3,681,106
Total difference: 2,864,858 for Hillary.
Hillary's wins in the states on both costs are staggering. California was the biggest, but NY was by almost 2 million, Illinois by about a million, etc. , so good luck with the bullshit point you and the asshole in the link you posted made that all of Hillary's vote total surplus came from California. IT IS NOT FKNG TRUE, ASSHOLE! California was the biggest BUT NOT ALONE.
Fake news is not only that, but also spun news like the shit you posted makes a point based on wishful reality. Reality is Hillary's MARGINS in the non swing states she won were huge, some of them more votes than the total votes in swing states she lost, because those states are NEARLY EMPTY, and some producing little if anything that ads to our GDP.
Have a nice day now.........