That's the past and if it concerned you, it was for you to mention at the time.
*Guilty. I rarely posted here.*
But if you accept the standard, which by applying it you accept, Sessions doesn't rise to it.
And he is the one under consideration at this time.
*It seems a double standard is applied. I was pointing that out and simply asking the question. My reply is not acceptance nor rejection, but it ain't half bad.*
We already know that he and the Republican Party don't observe the Constitution when it suits them not to. That much became obvious as a result of the refusal to consider the Garland nomination.
*A practice in which both parties have participated*
So I for one won't be surprised if this guy plays politics with the law.
*If that did not occur it would be a surprise*
Maybe these kinds of things are what you mean by the grown-ups taking over the government. For myself, I think these sorts of nominees are a reflection of the responsibility Trump voters bear for the destruction which is coming. Not overnight. But certainly.
*I agree the seeds for a calamity have been sown over the past decades and the can has been kicked down the road. I expect to see many very big problems on many fronts, problems that will need to be dealt with as they occur.*
And as surely I know that those who voted for him will disclaim their responsibility for what transpires.
*Given Trump's flaws, Trump seems to be proceeding in a businesslike fashion and seems to be seeking diverse perspectives in constructing the new administration. He is really an odd mix philosophically. I continue to have concerns about Trump and expect I always will. None of us know the future. I expect we will be in for a very rough ride. My preference easily remains Trump over Clinton.*
*For what its worth, I like it when you use capital letters and i don't like it when you don't use them, but I guess that's just me. Just thought I would mention it.*
| 