« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Sessions and Flynn

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 21 Nov 16 11:18 AM | 81 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 20247 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 20245 by xcslewis)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

That's the past and if it concerned you, it was for you to mention at the time.

But if you accept the standard, which by applying it you accept, Sessions doesn't rise to it. And he is the one under consideration at this time.

We already know that he and the Republican Party don't observe the Constitution when it suits them not to. That much became obvious as a result of the refusal to consider the Garland nomination.

So I for one won't be surprised if this guy plays politics with the law.

Maybe these kinds of things are what you mean by the grown-ups taking over the government. For myself, I think these sorts of nominees are a reflection of the responsibility Trump voters bear for the destruction which is coming. Not overnight. But certainly.

And as surely I know that those who voted for him will disclaim their responsibility for what transpires.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Sessions and Flynn
By: xcslewis
in ALEA
Mon, 21 Nov 16 12:56 AM
Msg. 20245 of 54959

So did Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch seem non-partisan, dispassionate, rational and trustworthy stewards of the law?


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next