Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: WSJ Editorial: Comey Refused to Press Charges to Spare Us President Trump 

By: zzstar in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (3)
Thu, 07 Jul 16 6:34 AM | 61 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3 		Msg. 22076 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 22066 by clo)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Bullshit. come knew there was no criminal case and his assertions were baseless, so he couldn't indict.

"It is possible that the server was compromised, but we could find no evidence of it".

Well FK YOU COMEY!

You have no proof, keep your mouth SHUT! You are making the more stupid into fools who take your bullshit and try to spin long yarns with it.

Nothing there, there. That's why NOTHING there, there, either.

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
WSJ Editorial: Comey Refused to Press Charges to Spare Us President Trump
By: clo in FFFT3
Thu, 07 Jul 16 4:45 AM 		Msg. 22066 of 65535

WSJ Editorial: Comey Refused to Press Charges to Spare Us President Trump
by Rachel Stockman | 7:53 am, July 6th, 2016

But, probably most shocking, at the end of the piece, the board asserts that Comey may have dodged the indictment to spare us all a President Donald Trump:

The rule of law requires its natural application. We almost wish Mr. Comey had avoided his self-justifying, have-it-both-ways statement sand said bluntly he could’t indict Mrs. Clinton because the country must be spared a Donald Trump Presidency. It would have been more honest and less corrosive to democracy than his Clinton Standard.

http://www.mediaite.com/print/wsj-editorial-comey-refused-to-press-charges-to-spare-us-president-trump/

« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next