« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Building a wall on the Southern frontier 

By: clo in ALEA | Recommend this post (2)
Mon, 25 Apr 16 5:59 PM | 94 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 18611 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 18609 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi Cactus Flower,

The Canadian border has been more of a 'terrorist' concern.
No one has suggested to build that wall.

Lets remember, the terrorists that attacked us on 9/11 had visas to be here. A wall wouldn't have helped us.

According to authorities, all of the hijackers who committed the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks were foreigners. All of them entered the country legally on a temporary visa, mostly tourist visas with entry permits for six months. Although four of them attended flight school in the United States, only one is known to have entered on an appropriate visa for such study, and one entered on an F-1 student visa. Besides the four pilots, all but one of the terrorists entered the United States only once and had been in the country for only three to five months before the attacks.

http://www.fairus.org/issue/identity-and-immigration-status-of-9-11-terrorists




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Building a wall on the Southern frontier
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Mon, 25 Apr 16 6:45 AM
Msg. 18609 of 54959

Hi clo,

The US may not need a wall. But many countries have them and they do something.

Sometimes a wall helps to keep people out who you don't want in. Or to funnel people towards legal crossing points.

I happen to agree that illegal immigration supports US agriculture and other industries. There's a massive net benefit to the country.

On the other hand, legal immigration (eg through a summer work programme) would mean field workers may be less subject to abusive treatment and exploitative wage levels.

The ease of illegal passage across the border results in everyone being complicit in this sort of abuse and exploitation from customs agents to folks purchasing cheap groceries to people in Washington who like the way things are.

So there's a cost of permissiveness. And a wall might reduce that cost, while increasing the cost of produce. A cost see-saw.

For me, it is non-obvious that a wall is intrinsically a good or a bad idea. It kinda depends on what the border threat is. If there were ISIS people on the other side, you'd want a big wall. Luckily for you, it's Mexico down there.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next