« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Top Arizona newspaper endorses Clinton 

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (1)
Sun, 27 Mar 16 11:52 PM | 87 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 18483 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 18482 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

The expansion of government spending for a few years after 2008 relative to GDP was, of course, due to the destruction of the economy under Bush-Cheney. That is, it was a denominator issue. Obama didn't expand the government. The economy contracted.

The Republicans sought to take advantage of Bush's disaster to shrink government rather than to learn the proper lessons of economic management. What they really need to do is to learn how to run an economy so that it expands. Their record is unfortunately poor if they actually take the trouble to review the history.

Improving an economy is not done by removing the rules that are employed to govern markets (although sometimes rules aren't constructive), or by lowering taxes by any means and in all circumstances (although lowering excessive and inefficient taxes makes sense). It is done by making government smarter.

Sometimes this will mean government intervention. Sometimes it will mean government standing aside.

When they get over the nonsense that government is always a bad thing, maybe they'll stop doing so much damage. And they'll get better candidates.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Top Arizona newspaper endorses Clinton
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Sun, 27 Mar 16 10:13 PM
Msg. 18482 of 54959

hi clo,

i agree.

in the past, conservatives were cautious about expanding government. now they are intent on tearing it to pieces. usually on anecdotal grounds. or because they hate obama.

fact is, the federal government has consumed around 20% of GDP since 1980. the entire conversation is spurious.

if you claim reagan as your political saint, then 20% is a good number. obama's spending is comparable with reagan's.

https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/FYONGDA188S


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next