« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Kasich delivers Ohio

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 22 Feb 16 9:12 AM | 74 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 18196 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 18192 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

largely yes, and in none of that list did I say that progressive taxation was part of the make-up.
Opposition to the Bush tax cuts is purely a fiscal response, they were clearly going to cause deficits, old guard fiscal conservatives not big fans of that. Sure they want to shrink govtment, but whatever size it endes up being, pay for it, pay for what is, not what you would like to be. Friedman as a representative/leader of a school of thought better represented by old guard republicans than any other politcal group. Taxing gas is 2 things, 1) a broad consumprion based tax specific to the users of something that 2) the actual costs are not realized (the permenant stationing of a few aircraft carrier task forces not really figured into the cost of a gallon and 3) it is a uniquely valuable resource that shouldn't be lazily squandered and the market is inefficient in recognizing that.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Kasich delivers Ohio
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Mon, 22 Feb 16 6:19 AM
Msg. 18192 of 54959

Which Friedman? Milton was an economist rather than a modern Republican and so said many thoughtful things. Like most leading edge folks, he wasn't right about everything but he was an interesting chap. Thomas is a guy who works for the NYT but my encounters with his writing led me in different directions so I have no idea if he is a Republican or what he says.

Krauthammer - okay. I didn't know he said such a thing so I guess there are such folks. It's the sort of thing traditional Republicans might say, so maybe he has some of that in him.

Or ...

The notion of taxing sales or energy might be construed as a means of reducing income tax. Not sure if that is the angle. Flat taxes and consumption taxes are not progressive. This is sometimes the underlying reason for an eccentric opinion amongst Republicans. They are artfully figuring out ways to reduce taxes on the wealthy and to plonk them on everyone else.

But heck, regardless of the motive, I like the idea of taxing gasoline.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next