Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The Constitution on the Supreme Court 

By: ribit in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 15 Feb 16 9:52 PM | 89 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3 		Msg. 19513 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 19507 by zzstar)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...there have been 151 nominees to the court and 29 were not confirmed by the Senate. You labor under the delusion that the house and senate are there to rubber stamp whatever obonzo says. Elections have consequences.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The Constitution on the Supreme Court
By: zzstar in FFFT3
Mon, 15 Feb 16 8:14 PM 		Msg. 19507 of 65535

President . . . shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law. . .

(Article II, Section 2, Clause 2)

In a few, that ugly bitch Mcmalaka has to act and adise and consent. There is no txt n the constitution hat says he can play dead , and/or play dead for a over a year.

Aren't the republicans bent on following the Constitution to the .....LETTER?

« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next